2008.04.16 Sided residual: Data Driven MC vs raw MC vs 2006 data

Ilya Selyuzhenkov April 16, 2008

Figure 1: Sided residual for raw MC (partonic pt 9-11)

Figure 2: Sided residual for data-driven MC (partonic pt 9-11)

Figure 3: Sided residual for data (pp Longitudinal 2006)

Different analysis cuts vs number of events which passed the cut

1. N_events : total number of di-jet events found by the jet-finder for gamma in eta region [1,2]
   (Geant record is used to get this number)
2. cos(phi_gamma - phi_jet) < -0.8 : gamma-jet opposite in phi
3. R_{3x3cluster} > 0.9 : Energy in 3x3 cluster of EEMC tower to the total jet energy.
4. R_EM^jet < 0.9 : neutral energy fraction cut for on away side jet
5. N_ch=0 : no charge tracks associated with a gamma candidate
6. N_bTow = 0 : no barrel towers associated with a gamma candidate (gamma in the endcap)
7. N_(5-strip clusler)^u > 3 : minimum number of strips in EEMC SMD u-plane cluster around peak
8. N_(5-strip cluster)^v > 3 : minimum number of strips in EEMC SMD v-plane cluster around peak
9. gamma-algo fail : my algorithm failed to match tower with SMD uv-intersection, etc...
10. Tow:SMD match : SMD uv-intersection has a tower which is not in a 3x3 cluser

Figure 4: Number of events which passed various cuts (MC data, partonic pt 9-11)