Below are studies of BSMD response and calibration algo based on BMSD response to single particle M-C
Input: single particle per event, fixed ET=6 GeV, flat eta [-0.1,1.1], flat |phi| <5 deg, 500 eve per sample, Geant geometry y2006
Cluster finder algo (sliding fixed window), tuned on electron events
Example of BSMDE response for electon:
McEve BSMD-E dump, dE is Geant energy sum from given strip, in GeV
dE=1.61e-06 m=104 e=12 s=1 stripID=15462
dE=2.87e-05 m=104 e=13 s=1 stripID=15463
dE=8.35e-06 m=104 e=14 s=1 stripID=15464
dE=1.4e-06 m=104 e=15 s=1 stripID=15465
Fig 1. gamma - later, job crashed.
Fig 2. electron
Fig 3. pi0
Fig 4. eta
Fig 5. pi minus
Fig 6. mu minus
Goal: test SMDE cluster finder on single particles M-C
Input: single particle per event, fixed ET=6 GeV, flat eta [-0.1,1.1], flat |phi| <5 deg, 5k eve per sample, Geant geometry y2006
Cluster finder algo (seed is sliding fixed window), tuned on pi0 events
Example of BSMDE response for pi0:
... strID=1932 u=0 ene/keV=0 strID=1933 u=1 ene/keV=0 + strID=1934 u=1 ene/keV=2.0 * strID=1935 u=1 ene/keV=48.2 *X strID=1936 u=1 ene/keV=3.9 * strID=1937 u=1 ene/keV=0.8 + strID=1937 u=0 ene/keV=0 strID=1938 u=0 ene/keV=0 strID=1939 u=2 ene/keV=1.5 + strID=1940 u=2 ene/keV=8.2 * strID=1941 u=2 ene/keV=28.1 *X strID=1942 u=2 ene/keV=13.8 * strID=1943 u=2 ene/keV=4.0 + strID=1944 u=0 ene/keV=5.6 strID=1945 u=0 ene/keV=0.5 strID=1946 u=0 ene/keV=0 strID=1947 u=0 ene/keV=0 ...
particle | any cluster found in the module, all eventsFig 1a | only events with exactly 2 found clustersFig 1b |
e- | ||
. | Fig 2a | Fig 2b |
pi0 | ||
. | Fig 3a | Fig 3b |
eta |
Smd cluster finder with sliding window of 3 strips + one strip on each end (total 5 strips) applied to all 9000 BSMDE,P strips, one gamma per event
Method: identify isolated EM shower and match BSMD cluster energy to tower energy
INPUT events: single particle per event, fixed ET=6 GeV, flat eta [-0.1,1.1], flat |phi| <5 deg, 5k eve per sample, Geant geometry y2006
Cluster finder algo (seed is sliding fixed window), tuned on pi0 events
This cluster finder process full Barrel West, more details about clustering is in one cluster topology , definition of 'barrel cell'
Isolated EM shower has been selected as follows, tuned on gamma events,
Example of EM cluster passing all those criteria is below:
smdE: ene/keV= 40.6 inTw 451.or.471 cell(15,12), jStr=7 in xCell=15 ... id=1731 ene/keV=4.9 * id=1732 ene/keV=34.3 X * id=1733 ene/keV=1.5 * ... ---- end of SMDE dump smdP: ene/keV= 28.5 inTw 471.or.472 cell(15,12), jStr=7 in xCell=15 ... id=1746 ene/keV=2.7 * id=1756 ene/keV=22.0 X * id=1766 ene/keV=3.7 * ... ---- end of SMDE dump muDst BTOW id=451, m=12 rawADC=12.0 * id=471, m=12 rawADC=643.0 id=472, m=12 rawADC=90.0 id=473, m=12 rawADC=10.0
will be show with more details. The following PDF files contain full set of plots for all other particles.
particle | # of eve | plots |
gamma | 25K | |
e- | 50K | |
pi0 | 50K | |
eta | 50K | |
pi- | 50K |
TOP: a) Cluster (Geant) energy; b) Cluster RMS, c) # of cluster per event,
BOTTOM: X-axis is eta location, 20 bins span eta [-1,+1]. d) cluster ene vs. eta, e) cluster RMS vs. eta, f) cluster yield vs. eta & phi.
see Fig 1 for details
TOP: a) cluster loss on subsequent cuts, b) # of accepted EM cluster vs. eta location, c) ADC distribution of hit tower (some wired gains are in default M-C), tower ADC is in ET
BOTTOM: X-axis is eta location, 20 bins span eta [-1,+1]. d) Eta-cluster , e) phi-cluster energy, f) hit tower ADC .
3 eta location of 0.1, 0.5, 0.9 of reco EM cluster are shown in 3 panels (2x2)
1D plots are ratios of the respective 2D plots.
The mean values of 1D fits are relative gains of BSMDP/BSMDP and BSMD/BTOW , determine for 10 slice in pseudorapidity. Game is over :).
Fig 6, Same as above, eta=0.1, single pi minus, 50K events.
Below are PDF plots for all particles:
Correction - label on the X-axis for 1D plots is not correct. I did not apply log10() - a regular ratio is shown, sorry.
Attachment 1:
Fig 1 & 2 reminds actual (pp data based) calibration for 2 eta location of 0.1 and 0.8, presented earlier.
Table 1 shows M-C simulation of average cluster energy (deposit in BSMD plane), its spread, and width as function of electron ET, separately for eta- & phi-planes of BSMD.
As expected, BSMD sampling fraction (SF, red column) is not constant but drops with energy of electron.
The BSMD SF(ET) deviates from constant by less then 20% - it is a small effect.
Fig 3,4,5 show expected BSMD response to M-C electrons with ET of 6,20, and 40 GeV. Only for the lowest energy the majority of EM showers fit in to the dynamic range of BSMD, which ends for energy deposit of about 60 keV per plane.
I was trying to be generous and draw the red line at DE~90 keV .
The rms of BSMD cluster is about 0.5 strips, so majority of energy is measured by just 2 strips (amplifiers). Such narrow cluster lowers saturation threshold.
Fig 6, shows BSMD cluster energy for PYTHIA W-events.
Fig 7 shows similar response to PYTHIA QCD events.
Compare area marked with red oval - there is strong correlation between BSMD energy and electron energy and would be not wise to forgo it in the e/h algo.
Conclusion:
The attached slides show 2008 HV setting of BSMD would lead to full saturation of BSMD response for electrons from W decay with ET as low as 20 GeV , i.e. would reduce BSDM dynamic range to 1 bit.0
For the reference:
* absolute BSMD calibration based on 2008 pp data.
http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/subsys/bemc/calibrations/bsmd/2008-bsmd-calibration/19-isolated-gamma-algo-description-set-2-0
* current BSMD HV are set very high , leading to saturation of BSMD at gamma energy of 7-10 GeV, depending on eta and plane. (Lets ignore difference between E & ET for this discussion, for now).
http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/subsys/bemc/calibrations/bsmd/2008-bsmd-calibration/20-bsmd-saturation
* STAR priorities for 2009 pp run presented at Apex: http://www.c-ad.bnl.gov/APEX/APEXWorkshop2008/talks/Dunlop_Star_Apex_2008.pdf
* Attachment 2,3 show BSMD-E, -P response for electrons with ET: 4,6,8,10,20,30,40,50 GeV and to Pythia W, QCD events (in this order)