2009.02.06 Pre-shower energy distribution Run6 vs. Run8 geometry
Ilya Selyuzhenkov February 06, 2009
Data sets
Cuts applied
- Di-jet events
- Require to reconstruct photon momentum (no gamma-jet isolation cuts)
- Gamma pt > 7GeV, jet pt > 7GeV
- L2gamma emulation in Monte-Carlo
- L2gamma triggered for pp2006 and pp2008 events
- cos (phi_jet - phi_gamma) < -0.8
- detector |eta_jet|< 0.8
- |v_z| < 100
Figures
Each figure has:
- All pre-shower conditions combined, No pre-shower cuts
- Red circles show pp2006 data
- Black triangles show pp2008 data
Data scaled to match the integraled yield from pp2006 data
- Green line shows MC sum: QCD + gamma-jet
Monte-Carlo results for QCD and gamma-jet samples are first
scaled to 3.164 pb^-1 according to Pythia luminosity,
added together, and then an additional fudge factor of 1.24 applied.
Fudge factor is defined as pp2006 to Monte-Carlo sum ratio
for pt_jet>7GeV and pt_gamma>7 candidates
Observations
- Pre-shower energy distributions from pp2008 data set
are narrower than that for pp2006 data.
This corresponds to smaller amount of material budget in y2008 STAR geometry.
- Pre-shower energy distribution from Monte-Carlo with y2006 geometry
closer follows the distribution from pp2008 data set, rather than that from pp2006 data.
This indicates the lack of material budget in y2006 Monte-Carlo.
Note: There is a "pre-shower sector 10 problem" for pp2008 data,
which results in migration of small fraction of events with pre-shower>0 into
pre-shower=0 bin (first zero bins in Fig.1 and 2. below).
For pre-shower>0 case this only affects overall normalization of pp2008 data,
but not the shape of pre-shower energy distributions.
I'm running jet-finder+my software to get more statistics from pp2008 data set,
and after more QA will produce list of runs with "pre-shower sector 10 problem",
so to exclude them in the next iteration of my plots.
Figure 1: Pre-shower1 energy distribution
Figure 2: Pre-shower2 energy distribution