Monte-Carlo setup:
Color coding:
Pre-shower bins:
Ep1/Ep2 is the energy deposited in the 1st/2nd EEMC pre-shower layer.
For a single particle MC it is a sum over
all pre-shower tiles in the EEMC with energy of 3 sigma above pedestal.
For eta-meson from pp2006 data the sum is over 3x3 tower patch
Single particle kinematic cuts: pt=7-8GeV, eta=1.2-1.4
Eta-meson shower shapes (blue) taken from Fig. 1 from here of this post
All shapes are normalized to 1 at peak (central strip)
Figure 1: Shower shape sorted by pre-shower conditions.
cAir-Fixed EEMC geometry (NO slow simulator, WITH SVT)
Ratio plot
Figure 2: Shower shape sorted by pre-shower conditions.
cAir-Fixed EEMC geometry (NO slow simulator, NO SVT)
Ratio plot
Figure 3: Shower shape sorted by pre-shower conditions.
cAir-Fixed EEMC geometry (WITH slow simulator, WITH SVT)
Ratio plot
Figure 4: Shower shape sorted by pre-shower conditions.
Old cAir-bug EEMC geometry (NO slow simulator, WITH SVT)
Click here to see the plot
Starting with a fixed (50K events) for each type of particle.
Change in number of counts for a given pre-shower bin
with different detector configuration shows pre-shower migration
Figure 5: Pre-shower migration.
cAir-Fixed EEMC geometry (WITH SVT)
Figure 6: Pre-shower migration.
cAir-Fixed EEMC geometry (WITHOUT SVT)
Figure 7: Sampling fraction (0.05 E_reco / E_thrown).
cAir-Fixed EEMC geometry (WITHOUT Slow-simulator)
Figure 8: Sampling fraction (0.05 E_reco / E_thrown).
cAir-Fixed EEMC geometry (WITH Slow-simulator)
Slow simulator introduce some non-linearity in the sampling fraction
Figure 9: Sampling fraction (0.05 E_reco / E_thrown).
cAir-Fixed EEMC geometry (WITHOUT SVT, WITHOUT Slow-simulator)
Click here to see the plot
Figure 10: Sampling fraction (0.05 E_reco / E_thrown).
Old cAir-bug EEMC geometry (NO slow simulator, WITH SVT)
Click here to see the plot
Monte-Carlo setup:
Color coding:
Pre-shower bins:
Note: Ep1/Ep2 is the energy deposited in the 1st/2nd EEMC pre-shower layer.
For a single photon MC it is a sum over
all pre-shower tiles in the EEMC with energy of 3 sigma above pedestal.
For eta-meson/gamma-jet candidates from pp2006 data the sum is over 3x3 tower patch
Single particle kinematic cuts: pt=7-8GeV, eta=1.2-1.4
Eta-meson shower shapes (blue) taken from Fig. 1 from here of this post
All shapes are normalized to 1 at peak (central strip)
Figure 1: Shower shape sorted by pre-shower conditions.
Figure 2: Shower shape ratio. All shapes in Fig. 1 are divided by single photon shape
for "SVT+LOW_EM" configuration (black circles in Fig. 1)
Figure 3: Sampling fraction (0.05 * E_reco/ E_thrown)
Figure 4: Pre-shower1 energy (all tiles)
Figure 5: Pre-shower2 energy (all tiles)
Figure 6: Post-shower energy (all tiles)
Figure 7: Pre-shower bin photon migration
Figure 8a: Energy ratio in 2x1 to 3x3 cluster
For the first 4 pre-shower bins total yield in MC is normalized to that of the data
Blue circles indicate photon-jet candidates [pp2006] (points from this post)
Same data on a linear scale
Figure 8b: Energy ratio in 2x1 to 3x3 cluster: 7 < pt < 8 and 1.2 < eta < 1.4
Figure 8c: Energy ratio in 2x1 to 3x3 cluster: 7 < pt < 8 and 1.6 < eta < 1.8
Figure 9: Average energy ratio in 2x1 to 3x3 cluster vs. thrown energy
Figure 10: Average energy ratio in 2x1 to 3x3 cluster vs. thrown energy
LOW_EM option for the STAR geometry (Low cuts on Electro-Magnetic processes)
is equivalent to the following set of GEANT cuts:
All these values are for kinetic energy in GeV.
Cut meaning and GEANT default values:
Some details can be found at this link and in the GEANT manual