>Dear Nu and Zhangbu,
>
>
>please find below our comments.
>
>Reader by the FIAS group for the new STAR paper:
>ˇ°Beam energy dependence of charge separation along the magnetic field in Au+Au collisions at RHIC.ˇ±
>
>
>Thanks for including us as readers for the paper draft. 
>Please find below a few technical comments:
>
>
>1. The article refers largely to the results and discussions 
>in the previous publications, which have to be carefully read 
>in parallel.

PAs: Thanks for reading the related papers. The current paper
is an extension of STAR's effort to explore this topic.

>2. Figure 2 is not easy to understand, since it refers to 
>the text, where the explanation is scattered along the article. 
>The same for Figs. 3 and 4. 

PAs: We followed the convention of our previous papers
in making the figures 2 and 3. The discussion of Fig 2
starts from "Figure 2 presents..." on page 4, and ends
with the systematic uncertainty discussion on the top-right
of page 5. The three paragraphs are one after another,
not scattered, though.

>3. Page 5, right column, line 5 refers to Fig. 3 and 4, 
>which are not yet presented and discussed. 

PAs: This part explains one type of systematic uncertainties,
that applies to all the three figures. Since this draft is 
intended for a letter, we want to keep the text as terse
as possible.

>4. Page 5, right column, line 8 after the formula (5): 
>ˇ°The line for k=1, (H_ss - H_os) ˇ° with comma would be more clear.

PAs: Now it is changed to
"The (H_ss - H_os) curve for k=1 suggests...".

>5. In Ref. 27 a blank space "V. A. Okorokovˇ± is required.

PAs: Done.

>Best regards, 
>Ivan Kisel.