- bouchet's home page
- Posts
- 2016
- 2015
- December (1)
- November (3)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (2)
- June (2)
- April (5)
- March (2)
- February (3)
- January (2)
- 2014
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (1)
- June (3)
- May (6)
- April (6)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- December (2)
- November (3)
- October (3)
- September (4)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- May (4)
- April (6)
- March (4)
- February (3)
- 2012
- 2011
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (4)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- July (6)
- June (2)
- May (3)
- April (3)
- March (2)
- 2010
- 2009
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2008
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
new sample auau 200GeV 2007ProductionMinBias
Test of rerun auau200GeV 200ProductionMinBias sample.
It has some fixes for the /StDaqLib/EVP/ssd_reader.cxx and /StDaqLib/SSD/SSD_Reader.cxx
cuts of primary tracks:
part I : on 500 files
TotNevent = 167031 Event Analyzed = 118219
Fig.1 : dca xy vs 1/P
Fig.2 : dca z vs. 1/P
Fig.3 Comparison of dca xy resolution with previous production (black : old, red :new)
Fig.4 Comparison of dca z resolution with previous production (black : old, red :new)
Part II : Origin of the "funky" shape for lower momentum.
The reason is because I used FitSlicesY() in a given range : |dca_{xy}| < 1
The following plot shows the dca_{xy} for tracks with TPc+SSD vs. 1/P
(This plot is for all the tracks)
However, I have to take into account the whole dca range : |dca_{xy}|<3 (as shown in the next plot)
(this plot is for positive tracks only)
it means that up to a given momentum, a fit with a gaussian is not meaningf
to do/investigate :
- increased tracks quality (Number of fit points, eta)
- fit double gaussian for |dca_{xy}| <3
Part II : cut on chi2 of primaries tracks
The following plot show the dca_{xy} vs the chi2 of primaries tracks (x-axis) for 0,1,2,3 and 4 silicon hits
From this plot, I put a cut on chi^{2} of primaries tracks : chi^{2} < 4.
There are no other cuts added and the existing cuts I used remain the same.
Fig2.a : dca xy resolution vs. 1/P
Fig2.b : dca z resolution vs.1/P
So it seems that cutting on chi^{2} of primaries tracks take the dca resolution in both direction to the level we expect.
- bouchet's blog
- Login or register to post comments