- bouchet's home page
- Posts
- 2016
- 2015
- December (1)
- November (3)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (2)
- June (2)
- April (5)
- March (2)
- February (3)
- January (2)
- 2014
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (1)
- June (3)
- May (6)
- April (6)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- December (2)
- November (3)
- October (3)
- September (4)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- May (4)
- April (6)
- March (4)
- February (3)
- 2012
- 2011
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (4)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- July (6)
- June (2)
- May (3)
- April (3)
- March (2)
- 2010
- 2009
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2008
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
chi^{2} criteria for primaries tracks
Cut on chi^{2} of tracks
The primaries tracks are flagged with a cut on dcaGlobal < 3cm.
However, there may be some clean-up to do using a cut on chi^{2} (old primary track flag)
The motivation was to removed to see where the tracks (with tpc+ssd only) with a large dca_{xy} or dca_{z} came from.
This cause this shape in the dca resolution in XY for the previous test production : 2007 P08ic MinBias
dca resolution in Z : 2007 P08ic MinBias
Following are represented the dca_{xy} and dca_{z} as a function of the chi^{2} of primaries tracks for 01,2,3 and 4 Silicon hits
Fig 1 : dca_{xy} vs chi^{2}
Fig 2 : dca_{z} vs chi^{2}
I fixed the cut on the chi^{2} at chi^{2}<4 for all tracks
Fig.3 dca_{xy} resolution vs. 1/P
Fig.4 dca_{z} resolution vs. 1/P
Fig 5. dca_{xy} resolution vs. 1/P for tracks with TPC+SSD for different cuts of the chi^{2}
Fig 6. dca_{z} resolution vs. 1/P for tracks with TPC+SSD for different cuts of the chi^{2}
observations :
- cut on chi2<30 seems to remove the large values of dca
- however, a same cut on chi2 is applied for both dca_xy and dca_z
Fig 7. dca_{xy} resolution vs. 1/P for tracks with TPC+SSD+SVT(>1) for different cuts of the chi^{2}
Fig 8. dca_{z} resolution vs. 1/P for tracks with TPC+SSD+SVT(>1) for different cuts of the chi^{2}
part II : studies of chi^2
The idea is to use (cut) the chi^2 instead of applying a cut on the dca, or the momentum of tracks.
However, chi^2, momentum and dca are correlated together :
- lower momentum will gives greater dca
- greater dca seems to appear up to a certain chi^2 (see Fig.1)
Fig 2.a : chi^{2} of tracks (N=0,1,2,3,4) vs 1/P
observations :
- there are many tracks (for N==1) with low momentum and high chi2
- the cut on chi2<30 removed those tracks
- do not appear for N>1
Fig 2.b : population of tracks (with N=0,1,2,3,4) under the chi^2 cut
Fig 2.c : chi^{2} of tracks (N=0,1,2,3,4) vs eta
For this sample of data (I did run over less files than previously), I get for the population of tracks (in percentage, have to X by 100)
- Si = 0 : entries = 0.418126
- Si = 1 : entries = 0.0806296
- Si = 2 : entries = 0.305136
- Si = 3 : entries = 0.161612
- Si = 4 : entries = 0.0344961
- bouchet's blog
- Login or register to post comments