EMCICs : Effect of resonances on non-id CF using a toy model
I. Description of the "problem"
When we studied an effect of resonance decay products on the shape of the correlation function for non-id pions we found a peak at low Q that we don't understand (see Figure 1). At the same time we don't see this peak for events including Kos resonances only (see Figure 2). The main difference between Ko s and both ω and ρ is that the first resonance has no width (that may be one possible origin of the peak at low Q). It seems to me it doesn't matter whether a resonance decays on two or three particles since we have peaks for both ω and ρ events.
Decay channels (of interest in this study) | ||
Resonance (values in [MeV]) | decay channel | % |
ω (782, Γ=8.44) | π+ π- π0 | ~ 89 % |
ρ (770,Γ=150.2) | π π | ~100 % |
K0s (498) | π+ π- | ~ 69 % |
Here I will try to investigate this issue further whether it's just due to resonance decays or something else.
II. Attacking the problem
A. Let's start with "the most extreme case" : no width of resonances and no boost.
Expectations : can't be simpler than this. Minv distribution for (π+,π-) should have just one peak due to resonances. However, even if three-body decay resonances have zero width, the width of the peak in Minv won't be zero.
If there is still a peak then at least we know it's not due to boosting or a bug in using B-W formula.
Figure 3: Minv distribution (No width of resonances, no boosting of decay products to lab frame).
B. No boost, but resonces have widths (where applies)
a) box
Figure 5: Minv distribution ( box-type of width of resonances, no boosting of decay products to lab frame).
b) B-W
c) weighted B-W
C. Boost , but no width
D. Boost and width
Minv Distribution
a) RHO
No Boost | With Boost | |
No Width | ||
Box Width | ||
BW Width | ||
a
- chajecki's blog
- Login or register to post comments