- kikola's home page
- Posts
- 2023
- 2021
- 2017
- December (1)
- 2016
- 2015
- 2014
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- April (3)
- February (3)
- January (1)
- 2013
- December (2)
- October (4)
- September (2)
- August (2)
- July (2)
- June (3)
- April (4)
- March (4)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2012
- December (2)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (3)
- July (7)
- June (1)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2011
- 2010
- 2009
- 2008
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
J/psi embedding - invariant mass and decay length issues
The issues:
- The invariant mass distribution: when primary tracks (mContamPairs branch in StMiniMcEvent class) are used to reconstruct Minv (Fig. 1) it is very different from Minv reconstructed using global tracks (mMatGlobPairs) - Fig 2.
Update:The difference between width of J/psi are most probably due to momentum resolution: see Fig. 3 and Fig 4.
-
J/psi decay length: Update: I misunderstood the meaning of mStopR variable. It describes the location in the x-y plane and not the distance from primary vertex. I checked the difference between the J/psi stop radius and Monte Carlo Vertex radius (R = sqrt (x2+y2) and there are the same (see Fig 5).
List of cuts:
- -30 < Vz < 30 cm
- |η| < 1
- pT > 1.1 GeV/c
- nHistPts > 25
Fig 1. J/psi invariant mass reconstrucerd using primary tracks (mContamPairs branch in StMiniMcEvent)
Fig 2. J/psi invariant mass reconstrucerd using global tracks (mMatGlobPairs branch in StMiniMcEvent)
Fig. 3 Single track momentum resolution
Fig. 4 Single track pT resolution
Fig. 5 Difference between the J/psi stop radius and Monte Carlo Vertex radius (R = sqrt (x2+y2)
Fig. 6 Stop Radius for J/psi embedded in Cu+Cu 200GeV (run 5)
Groups:
- kikola's blog
- Login or register to post comments