- rcorliss's home page
- Posts
- 2013
- January (1)
- 2012
- 2011
- 2010
- December (1)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (2)
- June (2)
- May (3)
- April (3)
- March (5)
- February (2)
- January (8)
- 2009
- December (5)
- November (1)
- October (7)
- September (10)
- August (4)
- July (3)
- May (1)
- February (1)
- January (1)
- 2008
- 2007
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Working Towards a Photon Cross Section
A schematic view of a cross section is:
d(sigma)/d(pT)d(eta) = ( Ncand gamma - (1-rejpi) * effcand. pi* Npi ) / ( effgamma* effcand. gamma )
This is missing things like sampled luminosity, which is needed to move from the pion cross section to Npi.
Step 1: _ Get Npi. These come from Werner Vogelsang's calculations
Step 2: _ Get effcand. gamma and effcand. pi. These come from running the gamma tree maker and comparing the candidate list to the list of all photons and pions in the MuDst.
Step 3: _ Get effgamma and rejpi. These come from looking at the distribution of the discriminant for photons and pions above and below our cut.
Step 4: _ Get Ncand gamma. Find and Run on the data to see how many gammas we see in the trees.
More on Step 1:
Jason Webb provided a text file with the cross section information in it, though there's some confusion abotu the actual units. They are picobarns times some energy factor, depending on whether the variable is d(sigma)/dpT or E3*d(sigma)/dp3. If I can get that sorted out, I can use the sampled luminosity to compute the expected number of pions in each pT bin, which is essentially Npi.
eta low | eta high | pt bin center | xs (Kretzer) | xs (KKP) |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 1.250000E+00 | 2.178977E+09 | 4.357954E+09 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 1.750000E+00 | 3.172613E+08 | 6.345227E+08 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 2.250000E+00 | 6.248686E+07 | 1.249737E+08 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 2.750000E+00 | 1.696970E+07 | 3.393939E+07 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 3.250000E+00 | 5.659016E+06 | 1.131803E+07 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 3.750000E+00 | 2.195180E+06 | 4.390360E+06 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 4.250000E+00 | 9.528124E+05 | 1.905625E+06 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 4.750000E+00 | 4.498952E+05 | 8.997903E+05 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 5.250000E+00 | 2.277608E+05 | 4.555216E+05 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 5.750000E+00 | 1.218908E+05 | 2.437816E+05 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 6.250000E+00 | 6.785643E+04 | 1.357129E+05 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 6.750000E+00 | 3.923550E+04 | 7.847099E+04 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 7.250000E+00 | 2.338287E+04 | 4.676574E+04 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 7.750000E+00 | 1.435601E+04 | 2.871203E+04 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 8.500000E+00 | 1.473451E+04 | 1.473451E+04 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 9.500000E+00 | 6.225844E+03 | 6.225844E+03 |
1.000000E+00 | 2.000000E+00 | 1.100000E+01 | 4.094889E+03 | 2.047444E+03 |
Brief Update: These numbers are in E*d3sigma/dp3 [pb/GeV2].
- rcorliss's blog
- Login or register to post comments