Home » Groups » STAR Protected

Mismatched Large Cells

Updated on Fri, 2010-08-06 14:49. Originally created by aic110 on 2010-08-05 09:27.

Table of mismatched cells according to mapping runs conducted over July of 2010

nstbmap rowmap colmap id1map id3map id4map nstb row col id1 id3 id4 notes
1 1 1 7005 13 10 1 1 1 7005 0 10 Had no card reading and the channel reading was small, few entries (6)
1 15 12 7006 12 12 1 15 12 7006 13 0 Had multiple channel readings and a wide card reading
1 26 9 7005 0 6 1 26 9 7005 0 0 Had multiple card and channel readings, card had one dominant peak
1 28 6 7006 8 14 1 28 6 7006 8 15 * The graph looks good-possible diagnosis: mapped incorrectly
2 1 2 7008 1 14 2 1 2 7008 6 14 Had multiple card and channel readings, channel had one dominant peak
2 2 0 7008 6 11 2 2 0 7008 0 13 Had no card reading and the channel reading was small, few entries (4)
2 2 8 7008 1 13 2 2 8 7008 6 13 Had multiple card and channel readings, card and channel had one dominant peak
2 14 15 7008 0 6 2 14 15 7008 0 0 Very small channel reading, not many entries (98)
2 16 10 7008 11 1 2 16 10 7008 6 5 Had multiple card and channel readings, no dominant peaks, 37 entries
2 17 8 7008 1 3 2 17 8 7008 0 3 Had multiple card and channel readings, both had dominant peaks
2 17 9 7008 1 0 2 17 9 7008 0 0 Had multiple card and channel readings, both had dominant peaks
2 17 10 7008 1 2 2 17 10 7008 0 2 Had multiple card and channel readings, both had dominant peaks
2 17 11 7008 1 5 2 17 11 7008 0 5 Multiple card peaks and a wide card peak
2 17 14 7008 1 1 2 17 14 7008 0 1 Multiple card peaks and a wide card peak
2 22 8 7008 2 3 2 22 8 7008 0 13 Multiple channel peaks and no card peaks, only 44 entries
2 26 6 7007 3 6 2 26 6 7007 3 5 Multiple card and channel peaks, wide channel peak
2 26 9 7008 5 1 2 26 9 7008 4 13 One card peak and no channel peak
2 31 0 7007 0 13 2 31 0 7007 0 0 One card peak and no channel peak, only 40 entries

The variables marked with "map" as a suffix are the cell designations determined from mapping runs.  The other variables are the cell designations determined by calculation.  The alternating coloring scheme is to make the mismatches easier to view and does not have any meaning.   Data from jgma called "Summary of runs taken for the FMS test" posted on 07-21-2010 drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/jgma/2010/jul/21/summary-runs-taken-fms-test were used to make this spreadsheet.  Data from "Summary of runs taken for the FMS test" was also used to produce a .pdf file documenting the calculated card and channel of all the runs STAR/files/userfiles/2958/file/CardChannel.pdf (channel is in red and card is in blue in this document). I marked nstb1row28col6 with an asterisk because it was the only one that produced a graph that looked reasonable and is probably mapped incorrectly.  All other cells are possibly dead or have something wrong with them.

 

Most likely dead cells

nstbmap rowmap colmap id1map id3map id4map nstb row col id1 id3 id4
1 1 1 7005 13 10 1 1 1 7005 0 10
1 15 12 7006 12 12 1 15 12 7006 13 0
1 26 9 7005 0 6 1 26 9 7005 0 0
2 1 2 7008 1 14 2 1 2 7008 6 14
2 2 0 7008 6 11 2 2 0 7008 0 13
2 2 8 7008 1 13 2 2 8 7008 6 13
2 14 15 7008 0 6 2 14 15 7008 0 0
2 16 10 7008 11 1 2 16 10 7008 6 5
2 17 8 7008 1 3 2 17 8 7008 0 3
2 17 9 7008 1 0 2 17 9 7008 0 0
2 17 10 7008 1 2 2 17 10 7008 0 2
2 17 11 7008 1 5 2 17 11 7008 0 5
2 17 14 7008 1 1 2 17 14 7008 0 1
2 22 8 7008 2 3 2 22 8 7008 0 13
2 26 6 7007 3 6 2 26 6 7007 3 5
2 26 9 7008 5 1 2 26 9 7008 4 13
2 31 0 7007 0 13 2 31 0 7007 0 0

The cells in the above table provided little or bad information and are most likely dead or bad cells. All had low ADC counts.

 

 

 

 

 

Most likely incorrectly mapped cell

nstbmap rowmap colmap id1map id3map id4map nstb row col id1 id3 id4
1 28 6 7006 8 14 1 28 6 7006 8 15

The above cell is the only one that provided a significant amount of good data (around half a million ADC counts).  The most likely reason for the discrepancy is incorrect mapping. 

Groups: