Twist correction notes, pp2009
The twist correction has been detailed in STAR notes and in blog entries (see Eric Hjort and Gene Van Buren's blogs). The entry is intended as a log of actions taken for the pp2009 calibration pass, and is not meant as a discussion of the physics motivation for the correction.
Pass 1:
1) copied directory ~andrewar/tpc/tpcwrkExB_2008 to ~aarose/tpc/tpcwrkExB_2009
Note: local checkout of StRoot/StDbUtilities and StRoot/StGenericVertexMaker for cons to succeed
2) Gene has prepass ready under:
/star/institutions/bnl/genevb/FOR_TWIST/*.event.root
Note: there are 24 files for RFF
3) Refit results in
~andrewar/tpc/tpcwrkExB_2009/outdirpp2009RFF10118_pass1
4) Build ntuple:
(cd outdirpp2009RFF10118_pass1; ls -1 *.root root.files)
root4star ~andrewar/tpc/tpcwrkExB_2009/StRoot/macros/make_res.C(10000,"outdirpp2009RFF10118_pass1")'
5) plot: (modify StRoot/macros/plot_vtx.C to point to the correct histos.root file)
root4star ~andrewar/tpc/tpcwrkExB_2009/StRoot/macros/plot_vtx.C
Output:
root4star [0]
Processing StRoot/macros/plot_vtx.C...
Info in <TCanvas::Print>: GIF file dvtxppzlt64.gif has been created
Info in <TCanvas::Print>: ps file dvtxppzlt64.ps has been created
Working on second plots...
done fitting Y slices...
starting gxe fit...
Fitting results:
Parameters:
NO. VALUE ERROR
0 3.126827e-01 3.247017e-03
1 1.481102e-03 1.744311e-04
done with gxe fit...
Fitting results:
Parameters:
NO. VALUE ERROR
0 3.125214e-01 3.516403e-03
1 1.369794e-03 1.950701e-04
still working...
still busy...
Fitting results:
Parameters:
NO. VALUE ERROR
0 -9.587691e-02 3.255975e-03
1 8.817128e-05 1.780517e-04
almost done...
Fitting results:
Parameters:
NO. VALUE ERROR
0 -1.044494e-01 3.596428e-03
1 1.149468e-04 2.041801e-04
Info in <TCanvas::Print>: GIF file bprofppzlt64.gif has been created
Info in <TCanvas::Print>: ps file bprofppzlt64.ps has been created
Conclusions:
The X intercept seems well calibrated, with only ~2um difference. However, keep in mind that the fit error is of order 10 um. The Y intercept has ~85um difference, but the error here is of the same order of magnitude. It would be best to have more data for the next pass.
- andrewar's blog
- Login or register to post comments