Updated study.

Again this shows strip printouts of areas of the detector where a track was estimated to have hit.

Compared to before I included also the areas where a hit was found with the same algo. I.e. extrapolating the hit and printing the strip area around.

For all tracks there is a comparison with the points in each plane with the extrapolation (lines starting with "Location at each disc "

But the big printout is only done for tracks which pass the chi2 (0.2 [cm]/dof) and vertex cut (+-20cm)

Also keep in mind that I number the discs starting from 0 (I shold change that, I know) that is why there is an inconsistency with the Strip naming and the disc numbering