These are the triggers used and the number of hadron pairs per trigger.

The dominating triggers are bemc jp and eemc jp. I suppose there is quite some overlap between the events.

I also attach eta, pt and m_inv distributions for the hadron pair for each trigger.

Offline Trigger ID, numHadPairs, name of trigger

117001: 125   (mb)

127212: 24275  (bemc-ht2-mb-emul (earlier version of 127213))
127213: 61979   (bemc-ht2-mb-emul)
127221: 579190  (bemc-jp1-mb)
127262: 16547   (eemc-ht2-mb-emul)
127271: 75893   (eemc-jp1-mb)
127501: 5402     (bemc-jp-mb)
127551: 4134   (eemc-jp0-mb)
127571: 1370   (bemc-jp1)
127575: 3510  (bemc-jp0-etot)
127580: 460   (eemc-http) ->removed
127585: 4380  (bemc-jp2)
127611: 154534 (bemc-http-mb-l2gamma)
127622: 588905 (bemc-jp0-etot-mb-L2jet)
127641: 37817 (eemc-http-mb-L2gamma) ->removed
127652: 122532 (eemc-jp0-etot-mb-L2jet) ->removed

The two eemc triggers appear exclusively rought 20% of the time

cone cut 0.2:

 we have 16480 only triggers and 66782 non exclusive eemc trigger, ratio: 0.197929

 mean m_inv with eemc exc: 0.456798 pt: 5.30283, mean m_inv non exc: 0.484227 pt: 5.9

cone cut 0.3

we have 30408 only triggers and 115969 non exclusive eemc trigger, ratio: 0.207738

 mean m_inv with eemc exc: 0.555145 pt: 5.15806, mean m_inv non exc: 0.579958 pt: 5.73218