- balewski's home page
- Posts
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- 2010
- 2009
- December (4)
- November (1)
- October (5)
- September (6)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- April (5)
- March (5)
- February (4)
- January (6)
- 2008
- December (1)
- November (1)
- September (3)
- July (1)
- June (4)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (3)
- January (2)
- 2007
- October (1)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
statistical error of AN, AL for phi-symmetric detector
Question : what is statistical error of AN, AL extracted from phi-symmetric detector
Model of spin dependent yield:
y=1.+sign*Al*P+sign*An*P*cos(phi);
where 'sign' is spin direction + or -
Fig 1: Example of distributions for + & -, total N0=Np+Nm=500 events, number of bins nb=12
Fit function: Double_t fitval = par[0]*sin(phi) + par[1]*cos(phi) +par[2];
Extraction of epsL=Al*P= (C0p-C0m)/N0*nb, sig(epsL)=1/sqrt(N0)
Extraction of epsN=An*P= (Ccp-Ccm)/N0*nb, sig(epsN)=1/sqrt(N0*2)
Conclusion: FOM for AN is half of FOM for AL.
Input of the program: simuAN_err(float An=0.1, float P=0.5, float Al=-0.2, int n0=500) Output of the program: yield: AL*P : assumed= -0.10 measured=-0.068 +/-0.045 diff=-0.032 diff/sig=-0.7 fit: AL*P : assumed= -0.10 measured=-0.054 +/-0.044 diff=-0.046 diff/sig=-1.0 fit: AN*P : assumed= 0.05 measured=-0.073 +/-0.062 diff=0.123 diff/sig=2.0 tot eve=500
Here's the link to the theory paper http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v103/i17/e172001
Fig 2. p+p -> W -> mu
Fig 3. The same simu and reco but with N0=50,000 events
yield: AL*P : assumed= -0.10 measured=-0.094 +/-0.004 diff=-0.006 diff/sig=-1.4 fit: AL*P : assumed= -0.10 measured=-0.094 +/-0.004 diff=-0.006 diff/sig=-1.4 fit: AN*P : assumed= 0.05 measured=0.053 +/-0.006 diff=-0.003 diff/sig=-0.4 tot eve=50000
Groups:
- balewski's blog
- Login or register to post comments