- bouchet's home page
- Posts
- 2016
- 2015
- December (1)
- November (3)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (2)
- June (2)
- April (5)
- March (2)
- February (3)
- January (2)
- 2014
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (1)
- June (3)
- May (6)
- April (6)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- December (2)
- November (3)
- October (3)
- September (4)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- May (4)
- April (6)
- March (4)
- February (3)
- 2012
- 2011
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (4)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- July (6)
- June (2)
- May (3)
- April (3)
- March (2)
- 2010
- 2009
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2008
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
SVT Meeting
04/29/2008 : embedding maker
05/05/2008
Quality of hits : it has to be calculated as the ratio between GEANT HIT energy and RECO HIT energy (see below)
When I applied this for SSD hits, I get some ratios > 1.
The reason is the following : if a GEANT particle induces signal on 4 strips (side P for example : s1,s2,s3,s4), then the charge of the GEANT hits is more or less the sum of the strips signal.
(I get (charge GEANT) /(sum strips signal) ~ 95 % ).
During the clusters and hit reconstruction, one or several of those strips may not be include because of the cut on the signal/noise used for the cluster formation.
Then the resulting cluster may have a lower energy (in ADC) than the sum of the signal strips.
Energy vs quality for TPC :
Energy vs quality for SVT :
Energy vs quality for ssd :
For the SSD, instead of the charge of the cluster, I took the sum of the charge + the noise of the cluster.
Even taken the cluster (P or N side) with the highest energy, I still have quality > 100
02/03/2009 : embedding data
check of geant input : file is /star/data06/embed/andrewar/P08id/AuAu/Piplus_101/st_physics_8172033_raw_1020010.geant.root
the next plots show the particle id, the pT range and the eta range
02/24/2009 :
- bouchet's blog
- Login or register to post comments