- bouchet's home page
- Posts
- 2016
- 2015
- December (1)
- November (3)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (2)
- June (2)
- April (5)
- March (2)
- February (3)
- January (2)
- 2014
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (1)
- June (3)
- May (6)
- April (6)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- December (2)
- November (3)
- October (3)
- September (4)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- May (4)
- April (6)
- March (4)
- February (3)
- 2012
- 2011
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (4)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- July (6)
- June (2)
- May (3)
- April (3)
- March (2)
- 2010
- 2009
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2008
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
HFT : pointing resolution with a toy model
Pointing resolution is defined by :
where the second term is :
The parameters studied here are the thickness x/X0 and the radius of layers r1 and r2
detector | radius [cm] | hit resolution [μm] | thickness [x/X0] |
HFT | 2.5 - 8 | 8.6 - 8.6 | 0.37% |
ITS | 3.9 - 7.6 | 12 - 100 | 0.40% |
VTX | 2.5 - 5.0 | 23 -23 | 1.2% |
SVT | 6.9 - 10.6 | 20(80) -20(80) | 1.5% |
The numbers in parenthesis for the SVT are realistic error , the other are the errors by design
Fig. 1 : Result for tracks with normal incidence
Fig. 2 : Result for tracks with normal incidence (zoomed)
- changing the parameters
For the HFT, I changed the radius of the first layer from 2.5cm ➟ 3cm and the thickness from 0.37%x/X0 ➟ 0.62%x/X0
Groups:
- bouchet's blog
- Login or register to post comments