- bouchet's home page
- Posts
- 2016
- 2015
- December (1)
- November (3)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (2)
- June (2)
- April (5)
- March (2)
- February (3)
- January (2)
- 2014
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (1)
- June (3)
- May (6)
- April (6)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- December (2)
- November (3)
- October (3)
- September (4)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- May (4)
- April (6)
- March (4)
- February (3)
- 2012
- 2011
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (4)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- July (6)
- June (2)
- May (3)
- April (3)
- March (2)
- 2010
- 2009
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2008
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
D0 crossfeed
goal : study the contamination due to mis-identification of daughter in D0->K^{-}pi^{+}
- use 50k D0 generated with starsim : powerlaw pt in [0,5], flat in -1<y<1, flat in 0< phi < 2pi
- reconstruction done in SL08f, y2007g geometry (SSD+SVT)
- MuDst file analyse with user analysis code
crossfeed appears when the kaon^{-} is identified as a pion^{-}, and the pion^{+} as a kaon^{+}
Then for the decayD0->K^{-}pi^{+}, the decay K^{+}pi^{-} = D0bar is reconstructed in lieu of a D0
first look : here
in this link : inv mass for all pairs, true D0, fakes as a function of PtD0, cosine(theta*)
second look : here
in this link , same as before but with graph instead of tables for summary + inv mass mean and width vs Pt for true and fakes
third look ; breakdown of cuts : here
in this link, study of how many D0 pairs are rejected at each steps/cuts of the analysis code
Groups:
- bouchet's blog
- Login or register to post comments