- ckimstar's home page
- Posts
- 2020
- 2019
- December (1)
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (4)
- August (4)
- July (3)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (5)
- February (1)
- January (1)
- 2018
- December (5)
- November (1)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- March (4)
- February (4)
- January (5)
- 2017
- December (2)
- November (3)
- October (4)
- September (5)
- August (6)
- July (2)
- June (3)
- May (4)
- April (5)
- March (4)
- February (3)
- 2016
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
FMS-FPS / FMS-FPost alignment status (2)
Updated on Wed, 2017-03-29 19:24. Originally created by ckimstar on 2017-03-29 19:19.
- Worked on FMS-FPS, FMS-FPost correlation check
- Tried to tune cut for backgrounds for both FPS/FPost
a. FPS: tune MIP cut of each channel (ongoing)
b. FPost:
1) tune MIP cut of each channel (ongoing)
2) applied FPS cut to select charged hadrons mainly. Quite effective (succeeded to see the ecpected correlation)
- Trying to pick a good run
- Quantification of measured slat position by fitting (ongoing)
- I'll prepare a full report once within 2 weeks
* 2D correlation plots: st_fms_18082010_raw_1500001.MuDst.root (10,000 events)
* 1D fit plots / graph: st_fms_18073040_raw_1000002.MuDst.root (~8,000 events)
»
- ckimstar's blog
- Login or register to post comments