- ckimstar's home page
- Posts
- 2020
- 2019
- December (1)
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (4)
- August (4)
- July (3)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (5)
- February (1)
- January (1)
- 2018
- December (5)
- November (1)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- March (4)
- February (4)
- January (5)
- 2017
- December (2)
- November (3)
- October (4)
- September (5)
- August (6)
- July (2)
- June (3)
- May (4)
- April (5)
- March (4)
- February (3)
- 2016
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Splitting mass in small cells - after debugging
- Akio's study: www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/akio/fms2015/showershape.html
- A bug was found which created in recent shower shape update:
I put those values as default (Zhanwen's shape, and 0.8/0.6).
By default, without calling setScaleShowerShape() nor setShowerShapeWithAngle(), one should get the parameters right.This also fixes a bug where it always uses large cell shower shape parameters with Zhanwen's shower shape and
when setMergeSmallToLarge option on. So effectively Zhanwen's shower shape for small cell was at ~x1.3 wider than intended,
and about ~x2 too wider than this study tells me to put (and only for small cells, and only when setMergeSmallToLarge is on).
This was causing massive pulls of photons towards center.- Akio, Apr. 16, 2019
//--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Tested same QA codes after running a Scheduler with debugged libraries (StEvent, StFmsHitMaker, StFmsPointMaker, and StFmsUtil/)
- For the better comparison same type of figures "before" debugging also will be shown
- Only detId 10 (Small cell north) will be shown: detId 11 is NOT very different
1. Mass vs. pair E, separated by Zgg in stepwidth of 0.1
1-a. Before debug (reported before)
1-b. After debug
2. Mass vs. pair E, incremental Zgg in stepwidth of 0.1
2-1. Before debug
2-2. After debug
3. Distance between points, separated by Zgg in stepwidth of 0.1
3-1. Before debug
3-2. After debug
//--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Tested points' XY distribution if those "grid" like structure still exists
- Weak concentration still exists, but much eased. I think it's reasonable enough
4. Points' XY distribution
4-a-1. All, before debug
4-a-2. All, after debug
4-b-1. Large cells, before debug
4-b-2. Large cells, after debug
4-c-1. Small cells, before debug
4-c-2. Small cells, after debug
//--------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Mass vs. Zgg, separated by pair E in stepwidth of 10
5-1. Before debug
5-2. After debug
* 6. Mass vs. Zgg, separated by pair E in stepwidth of 10, for detId = 8
6-1. Before debug
6-2. After debug
- ckimstar's blog
- Login or register to post comments