Here, I post updated results using the new cone radius of R = 0.5. Results are still preliminary in a few ways:

• Verify three-Gaussian fits to n_σ(π) distributions are robust
• Revisit trigger-bias estimates
• Still need maximized projections from the Torino group for Collins-like

From discussions with the jet group, the plan would be to include Figs. 1-3 in the paper and convert Figs. 4-5 to a single table. After observing the large Collins asymmetry, the high-p_T Collins vs. j_T will be promoted to a figure.

Figure 1: Inclusive Jet Azimuthal Asymmetry

Could think about quoting mean η rather than range of η. Also, I will check with Koichi Kanazawa for updated theory curves.

Figure 2: Collins(-like) Asymmetry vs. z

Aside from that listed above these should be close to ready.

Figure 3: Collins-like Asymmetry vs. z for Low p_{T, jet}

To do:

• Try to obtain theoretical predition for maximized scenario
• Verify trigger bias estimate

Figure 4: Collins(-like) Asymmetry vs. p_T

To do:

• Verify trigger bias estimate (currently using what was determined for Inclusive jet asymmetry vs. p_T

Figure 5: Collins-like Asymmetry vs. p_{T, jet} for Low z

To do:

• Try to obtain theoretical predition for maximized scenario (should be ~2% or so)
• Verify trigger bias estimate (currently using what was determined for Inclusive jet asymmetry vs. p_T)

Figure 6: Collins Asymmetry vs. j_T in Bins of z and p_{T, jet}

To do:

• Recalculate for new cuts (aside from high-p_T)
• Real average z for each bin (aside from high-p_T, currently just the center of the detector-z bin)
• See if I can reduce "horizontal" uncertainty on first j_T bin of low-p_T, z ~ 0.25 and next-to-last j_T bin of low-p_T, z ~ 0.55
• Verify trigger bias estimate (currently using what was determined for Inclusive jet asymmetry vs. p_T

Figure 7: Collins-like Asymmetry vs. j_T in Bins of z and p_{T, jet}

To do:

• Recalculate for new hadron radius cut
• Real average z for each bin (currently just the center of the detector-z bin)
• Decide what to do about lowest-j_T π⁺ point of high-p_T, z ~ 0.15, η < 0 bin (-0.074±0.026) -- Plan to drop these bins!
• See if I can reduce "horizontal" uncertainty on first j_T bin of low-p_T, z ~ 0.25 and next-to-last j_T bin of low-p_T, z ~ 0.55
• Verify trigger bias estimate (currently using what was determined for Inclusive jet asymmetry vs. p_T