- fisyak's home page
- Posts
- 2024
- 2023
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (4)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2022
- 2021
- December (2)
- October (2)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- June (3)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (5)
- January (4)
- 2020
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- December (3)
- October (2)
- September (1)
- August (7)
- July (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2016
- 2015
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (4)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (4)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- February (3)
- January (1)
- 2014
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- 2010
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Follow up on Yan Yang's bad run list
I have compared dE/dx distributions for AuAu 19 and pp500 using whole dE/dx sample and sample with rejected runs taken from Yan Yang's bad run list.
I see that for AuAu 19 rejection helps to remove extra band for low dE/dx.
For pp500 the rejection does not help. This means that there are still some problematic tpcAnodeHVavg tables for runs which are not marked as "bad".
The plots :
1. pp500:
2. AuAu19
Groups:
- fisyak's blog
- Login or register to post comments