- fisyak's home page
- Posts
- 2024
- December (1)
- November (1)
- October (4)
- September (3)
- August (6)
- July (3)
- June (3)
- March (1)
- February (4)
- January (2)
- 2023
- December (2)
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (4)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2022
- 2021
- December (2)
- October (2)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- June (3)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (5)
- January (4)
- 2020
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- December (3)
- October (2)
- September (1)
- August (7)
- July (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2016
- 2015
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (4)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (4)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- February (3)
- January (1)
- 2014
- 2013
- December (4)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Run XVIII AuAu27 part I dE/dx with respect to part II calibration.
Updated on Tue, 2019-06-11 11:10. Originally created by fisyak on 2019-06-11 11:10.
I have compared the results of production on part I AuAu27 dE/dx (RunXVIII201) with respect to the final part II AuAu27 dE/dx calibration (RunXVIII137):
1. Relative dE/dx resolutions versus track length in TPC for part II ( 137) and part I (201) are practically the same.
.png)
2. Shifts are compatible..png)
.png)
.png)
3. RunXVII137 dE/dx
4. RunXVII201 dE/dx
.png)
Conclusion:
The dE/dx calibration done for RunXVIII AuAu27 Part II is working also for Part I.
»
- fisyak's blog
- Login or register to post comments