An SL10f vs. SL10g comparison

Repeating the analysis from my previous blog entry, but using SL10f and SL10g with identical chains (that used from the SL09g W production). A high fraction of the tracks are now matched, and I'm left with only 1795 unmatched from SL10f and 1777 from SL10g (not much statistics to do 2D plots).


Vs. pT and vs. peudorapidity shows a dramatic high pT loss and gains at intermediate pT, and bit of loss at high positive eta (and gain at high negative eta):


Vs. track length and radius of first point shows nothing much notable:


Vs. sector shows more losses in west (1-12) than east (13-24):