- genevb's home page
- Posts
- 2024
- 2023
- 2022
- September (1)
- 2021
- 2020
- 2019
- December (1)
- October (4)
- September (2)
- August (6)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (4)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (3)
- 2018
- 2017
- December (1)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- 2016
- November (2)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (5)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2015
- December (1)
- October (1)
- September (2)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- January (3)
- 2014
- December (2)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (9)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- December (5)
- October (3)
- September (3)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- May (4)
- April (4)
- March (7)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2012
- December (2)
- November (6)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (7)
- July (2)
- June (1)
- May (3)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- 2011
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (4)
- August (2)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (4)
- April (9)
- March (5)
- February (6)
- January (3)
- 2010
- December (3)
- November (6)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (5)
- July (1)
- June (4)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (4)
- January (2)
- 2009
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (6)
- August (4)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (5)
- April (5)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- 2008
- 2005
- October (1)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
EbyE T0 for production_4p59GeV_fixedTarget_2019
Updated on Wed, 2024-05-29 13:40. Originally created by genevb on 2024-05-29 09:15.
Following up on my blog post from last year (Looking into event-by-event T0 in FXT), which looked at Run 19 3.85 GeV FXT, I calibrated here Run 19 4.59 GeV FXT. I again found that Irakli's method had the same flaws:
The EPD and VPD show the narrowest peaks after correction, while the BBC shows the most complete coverage of having a real signal in each event. So the BBC is used as the final fallback option after EPD and VPD are tried first:
Option 1: 0.01683 - 1.664e-05*epde (covers ~80% of events)
Option 2: 0.02853 - 1.711e-05*vpde (brings up to 92%)
Option 3: 0.02298 - 1.620e-05*bbce (brings up to 99.9%)
-Gene
- For roughly ~10% of events, the EPD west had a higher Max TAC than EPD east and was used for the T0
- For another ~10% of events, the EPD east had a value of 0 that was considered valid and was used for the T0
EPD east | VPD east | BBC east | |
---|---|---|---|
Distribution of ptime vs. Max TAC for non-zero ptime and Max TAC |
|||
Spread profile with fit (errors on the mean are much smaller) |
|||
Fit of ptime peak |
|||
Fit of ptime peak after slope correction |
The EPD and VPD show the narrowest peaks after correction, while the BBC shows the most complete coverage of having a real signal in each event. So the BBC is used as the final fallback option after EPD and VPD are tried first:
Option 1: 0.01683 - 1.664e-05*epde (covers ~80% of events)
Option 2: 0.02853 - 1.711e-05*vpde (brings up to 92%)
Option 3: 0.02298 - 1.620e-05*bbce (brings up to 99.9%)
-Gene
»
- genevb's blog
- Login or register to post comments