- genevb's home page
- Posts
- 2024
- 2023
- 2022
- September (1)
- 2021
- 2020
- 2019
- December (1)
- October (4)
- September (2)
- August (6)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (4)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (3)
- 2018
- 2017
- December (1)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- 2016
- November (2)
- September (1)
- August (2)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (5)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2015
- December (1)
- October (1)
- September (2)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- January (3)
- 2014
- December (2)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (2)
- May (2)
- April (9)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- December (5)
- October (3)
- September (3)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- May (4)
- April (4)
- March (7)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2012
- December (2)
- November (6)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (7)
- July (2)
- June (1)
- May (3)
- April (1)
- March (2)
- February (1)
- 2011
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (4)
- August (2)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (4)
- April (9)
- March (5)
- February (6)
- January (3)
- 2010
- December (3)
- November (6)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (5)
- July (1)
- June (4)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (4)
- January (2)
- 2009
- November (1)
- October (2)
- September (6)
- August (4)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (5)
- April (5)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- 2008
- 2005
- October (1)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Event-by-Event T0 in Run 21 FXT
Updated on Thu, 2023-08-10 16:25. Originally created by genevb on 2023-08-10 16:25.
This is a calibration of my event-by-event T0 correction method for Run 21 FXT data due to when a collision occurs within a bunch crossing (primarily an issue for long bunches, as is the case in fixed target data). There are 5 FXT beam energies, so these are the results for all 5.
NB: The 3p85 GeV data has a correction for SpaceCharge while the others do not.
You may want to open the plots in a separate browser tab or window to see them at full resolution. They are shrunk here to fit nicely. The left set of 4 plots show the dependency TPC timing as measured by a mean (profile) of TPC prompt hit times in the east TPC versus various trigger detector first hit times:
The right side plots use those fits to correct the TPC timings for the dependence and then show the spread of the remaining time distribution. The top left plot no longer shows EPD west, but rather the uncorrected TPC time distribution.
After the plots is a table of relevant information for how these three corrections perform in reducing the spread of the timing, and what database parameters would need to be used for those corrections to be applied properly.
3p85: P2021a,StiCA,FXT,EbyET0,BEmcChkStat,-OPr13,OPr40,-hitfilt,-mtd,-etofA,-picoWrite,-EventQA
others: P2021a,StiCA,FXT,EbyET0,-OSpaceZ2,-OGridLeakFull,BEmcChkStat,-hitfilt,-mtd,-etofA,-picoWrite,-EventQA
I have attached the macro that I use to fit the data. One can execute it via:
NB: The 3p85 GeV data has a correction for SpaceCharge while the others do not.
You may want to open the plots in a separate browser tab or window to see them at full resolution. They are shrunk here to fit nicely. The left set of 4 plots show the dependency TPC timing as measured by a mean (profile) of TPC prompt hit times in the east TPC versus various trigger detector first hit times:
- EPD west (upper left)
- EPD east (upper right)
- VPD east (lower left)
- BBC east (lower right)
The right side plots use those fits to correct the TPC timings for the dependence and then show the spread of the remaining time distribution. The top left plot no longer shows EPD west, but rather the uncorrected TPC time distribution.
After the plots is a table of relevant information for how these three corrections perform in reducing the spread of the timing, and what database parameters would need to be used for those corrections to be applied properly.
3p85
original width = 0.0144715 rms = 0.0149664 mean = -0.11323 epde : width = 0.0126401 rms = 0.013566 from: -0.0140909 1.12934e-05 vpde : width = 0.00947877 rms = 0.0110784 from: -0.0198795 1.55742e-05 bbce : width = 0.0108243 rms = 0.0120654 from: -0.0192219 1.40983e-05
26p5
original width = 0.00919687 rms = 0.0151638 mean = -0.117499 epde : width = 0.00775517 rms = 0.014457 from: -0.0162789 1.27763e-05 vpde : width = 0.00714808 rms = 0.012014 from: -0.0298654 1.95667e-05 bbce : width = 0.00729246 rms = 0.0147443 from: -0.0275149 1.73699e-05
44p5
original width = 0.00941487 rms = 0.0127096 mean = -0.115587 epde : width = 0.00772533 rms = 0.0118944 from: -0.0162537 1.19758e-05 vpde : width = 0.00716421 rms = 0.010239 from: -0.0278776 1.79982e-05 bbce : width = 0.00713588 rms = 0.0121915 from: -0.0304162 1.85159e-05
70
original width = 0.0100569 rms = 0.0137423 mean = -0.12065 epde : width = 0.00668909 rms = 0.0124718 from: -0.0249138 1.54574e-05 vpde : width = 0.00644711 rms = 0.0114357 from: -0.0291038 1.63452e-05 bbce : width = 0.00668231 rms = 0.0132153 from: -0.0300936 1.5867e-05
100
original width = 0.0100891 rms = 0.0131649 mean = -0.122306 epde : width = 0.00642588 rms = 0.0114771 from: -0.0291507 1.70661e-05 vpde : width = 0.00645699 rms = 0.0119975 from: -0.0238381 1.30892e-05 bbce : width = 0.00652631 rms = 0.0127114 from: -0.0340659 1.71333e-05
Additional information:
Reconstruction chains used in processing 5000 events from each energy:3p85: P2021a,StiCA,FXT,EbyET0,BEmcChkStat,-OPr13,OPr40,-hitfilt,-mtd,-etofA,-picoWrite,-EventQA
others: P2021a,StiCA,FXT,EbyET0,-OSpaceZ2,-OGridLeakFull,BEmcChkStat,-hitfilt,-mtd,-etofA,-picoWrite,-EventQA
I have attached the macro that I use to fit the data. One can execute it via:
root -l EbyET0.22126023.2553948.root 'dofits.C(0,"44p5")'
»
- genevb's blog
- Login or register to post comments