- heppel's home page
- Posts
- 2021
- July (3)
- 2020
- February (1)
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- 2016
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (1)
- July (3)
- June (5)
- May (8)
- April (4)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (2)
- 2015
- December (1)
- November (4)
- October (8)
- September (4)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (7)
- May (8)
- April (5)
- March (13)
- February (5)
- January (2)
- 2014
- December (1)
- November (2)
- September (1)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (3)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- December (2)
- November (1)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (6)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (3)
- January (3)
- 2010
- December (1)
- November (2)
- September (2)
- August (1)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2009
- 2008
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Run12TransversePi0Result.
The attached note:
http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Run12.pdf
contains is a summary of work done on a first pass analysis of all Run 12 FMS transverse polarized pi0 production data.
The most important point may be the observation that the increasing AN for Pi0's at large PT
does not seem to come from traditional jet-like events.
The basic points are:
- Definitions of data set and selection process for pi0's with background EM energy.
- Pi0 AN is measured over the full rapidity and energy range of the FMS (Figure 3)
- The low xF rise in AN with PT is observed to be quite dramatic, especially for isolated pi0 events at lower xF (Figures 5 and 6).
- At large xF there may be evidence for fall off of AN at large pT (small pseudo-rapidity).
- The low xF rise in AN with PT is associated with events that have isolated Pi0's.
- The Pi0's that come from jets, with jet background energy observed, do not have a significant rise in AN at large PT.(Figures 9 - 11)
- The Run 12 AN is compared to Run 6 published data. (Figure 15)
- The FMS can be divided into tow detectors (top and bottom halves). Each was separately used to analyze asymmetries for checks. (Figure 16)
- The Yellow beam asymmetry was measured to be in stastically agreement with zero (<AN(yellow)> < 0.001) (Figure 18)
- Assuming constant blue beam polarization of 60%, we measure a fill dependent average Yellow and Blue Asymmetry. (Figure 19)
Groups:
- heppel's blog
- Login or register to post comments