The data that I have proposed to show for CIPANP has very wide mass cuts.

Carl suggested that I should make fiducial cuts to eliminate data from Eta>4.0 and Eta<2.7

Renee suggested that I should change  mass cuts to see how the asymmetry changes.

I have recalculated AN for the 70mRadian cone size using

1) 4.0>Eta>2.7

2) .04<Mass<.3 (GeV)   (it had been 0<Mass<.4 GeV).

The results are shown here.

Note again the comparison is side by side and only the blue has changed.

Steve Heppelmann