- heppel's home page
- Posts
- 2021
- July (3)
- 2020
- February (1)
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- 2016
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (1)
- July (3)
- June (5)
- May (8)
- April (4)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (2)
- 2015
- December (1)
- November (4)
- October (8)
- September (4)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (7)
- May (8)
- April (5)
- March (13)
- February (5)
- January (2)
- 2014
- December (1)
- November (2)
- September (1)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (3)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- December (2)
- November (1)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (6)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (3)
- January (3)
- 2010
- December (1)
- November (2)
- September (2)
- August (1)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2009
- 2008
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Versions CIPANP 2012 Talk
Final Version of CIPANP talk
STAR/files/userfiles/1651/file/Talks/CIPANPHeppelmann.pdf(uploaded May 31 2012)
Extra slides:
STAR/files/userfiles/1651/file/Talks/ExtraCIPANPHeppelmann.pdf
Extra slides that answer some questions asked by Carl.
Extra slides 30-32: compare the mass distributions for the 30mR cone and the 70mR cone over all energies and pseudorapidities
Extra slide 33: A model that removes the correlated error due to shared events in 30mR and 70mR cones to extract the difference between samples
Extra slide 34-36 Application of above model to determine the significance of the difference between 30mR and 70mR cones.
Data points:
STAR/files/userfiles/1651/file/talkdata/Edep(1).txt
STAR/files/userfiles/1651/file/talkdata/Ptdep(1).txt
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Older versions
STAR/files/userfiles/1651/file/Talks/FMS201CIPANPV12.pdf
STAR/files/userfiles/1651/file/Talks/FMS201CIPANPV11.pdf
STAR/files/userfiles/1651/file/Talks/FMS201CIPANPV10.pdf
STAR/files/userfiles/1651/file/Talks/FMS201CIPANPV8.pdf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Responding to several issues raised by Renee and Stephen and Hal
http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/heppel/2012/may/07/cipanp-pt-dependence
http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/files/userfiles/1651/file/Talks/ForHall-Rene(1).pdf
http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/heppel/2012/may/14/about-changing-mass-cuts-pi0
http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/heppel/2012/may/14/possible-issues-eta40-and-cosphi-1
http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/heppel/2012/may/15/cipanp-analysis-code
Below is the latest version of my CIPANP talk with
tighter mass cuts for pi0 (Renee)
reflecting <pol>=.48 for blue beam (Stephen)
fiducial cuts on pseudorapidity 3.7<eta<4.0
STAR/files/userfiles/1651/file/Talks/FMS201CIPANPV4.pdf
- heppel's blog
- Login or register to post comments