- heppel's home page
- Posts
- 2021
- July (3)
- 2020
- February (1)
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- 2016
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (1)
- July (3)
- June (5)
- May (8)
- April (4)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (2)
- 2015
- December (1)
- November (4)
- October (8)
- September (4)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (7)
- May (8)
- April (5)
- March (13)
- February (5)
- January (2)
- 2014
- December (1)
- November (2)
- September (1)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (3)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- December (2)
- November (1)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (6)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (3)
- January (3)
- 2010
- December (1)
- November (2)
- September (2)
- August (1)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2009
- 2008
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
FNAL Base Rate Simulation
This is just a first third attempt to look at the FNAL base to get some idea about the effects of rate.
See attached pdf
Simulation 1:
rate= 12000 PE / (2 uS)
Simulation 2:
rate=1200 PE/(2 uS)
Note on rates,
What is simlated here is 1200 photo electrons at a rate (period= 2 microseconds).
That corresponds to about 3 GeV/microsecond /channel
If there was 1 collision per microsecond of a 100 GeV beam and if id
deposited 1/5 of its energy as EM energy in the 700 large cells, that would be a
deposited energy of 20 GeV/700 per cell = .03 GeV/cell. That is an average rate
of <10 Photoelectrons per second.
This would be a larger number of Photo electrons at 250 GeV.
Groups:
- heppel's blog
- Login or register to post comments