- heppel's home page
- Posts
- 2021
- July (3)
- 2020
- February (1)
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- 2016
- December (2)
- November (2)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (1)
- July (3)
- June (5)
- May (8)
- April (4)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (2)
- 2015
- December (1)
- November (4)
- October (8)
- September (4)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (7)
- May (8)
- April (5)
- March (13)
- February (5)
- January (2)
- 2014
- December (1)
- November (2)
- September (1)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (3)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- December (2)
- November (1)
- September (2)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (6)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (3)
- January (3)
- 2010
- December (1)
- November (2)
- September (2)
- August (1)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2009
- 2008
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Inclusive Contributions
1) The original writup:
drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/InclusiveAnal.pdf
is a systematic look at the pi0 signals from small and large cone sizes and with minimum photon energies of 1 GeV and 6 GeV.
My conclusion is that analysis of the 6 GeV minimum photon energy signal with cone angle of 0.035 radians, considering either 2 photon clusters or analyzing the high energy pairs in all n photon clusters are both good approximations to the inclusive cross section.
2) Second writup:
This note looks at photon pairs with photon pair P t >1.5 GeV for minimum photon energy of 3 & 6 GeV. We consider cone angles of 0.035 & 0.200 radians.
drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/InclusiveAnald.pdf
3) Third writup:
This note looks at photon pairs with photon pair P t >2.0 GeV for minimum photon energy of 3 & 6 GeV. We consider cone angles of 0.035 & 0.200 radians.
drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/InclusiveAnale.pdf
- heppel's blog
- Login or register to post comments