- jwebb's home page
- Posts
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- 2016
- 2015
- 2014
- 2013
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (1)
- July (1)
- June (1)
- April (1)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- January (1)
- 2012
- 2011
- December (2)
- September (3)
- August (5)
- July (6)
- June (6)
- May (1)
- April (5)
- March (5)
- February (2)
- January (2)
- 2010
- December (3)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (2)
- June (2)
- May (4)
- April (4)
- March (2)
- February (4)
- January (10)
- 2009
- 2008
- 2007
- 2006
- July (1)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Stv and Sti treatement of dEdx and MCS
1) Sti and Stv appear to use the same energy loss functions, gdrelx and gfluct, obtained from G3. There is a difference in the way Sti and Stv call gfluct (which is renamed gsigma2 in both packages)...
In Stv:
fdEdXErr2 = gsigma2(fZ/fA,fDens,fCharge2,fM ,beta2,1.);
In Sti:
double err2=gsigma2(_Z/_A,1.,z2,m ,beta2,1.);
Sti is obtaining a significantly larger error in gasses (density < 1 ) and a significantly smaller error in solid materials (density > 1), because the energy loss squared (?) is directrly proportional to density.
Sti may correct for this later... but I need to trace the spaghetti code which is Sti. Or Sti may neglect energy loss fluctuations entirely.
Groups:
- jwebb's blog
- Login or register to post comments