- jwebb's home page
- Posts
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- 2016
- 2015
- 2014
- 2013
- November (1)
- October (1)
- September (1)
- July (1)
- June (1)
- April (1)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- January (1)
- 2012
- 2011
- December (2)
- September (3)
- August (5)
- July (6)
- June (6)
- May (1)
- April (5)
- March (5)
- February (2)
- January (2)
- 2010
- December (3)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (2)
- June (2)
- May (4)
- April (4)
- March (2)
- February (4)
- January (10)
- 2009
- 2008
- 2007
- 2006
- July (1)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
Notes on BaseQA with HFT hits
Updated on Tue, 2015-09-15 11:24. Originally created by jwebb on 2015-09-15 11:18.
Goal: compare TPC only tracks which would have been reconstructed with HFT hits to corresponding HFT tracks.
Method: Reconstruct events with HFT in tracking. Create a TTree associating ID truth with number of reco hits in each layer. Process TPC only tracking sample and apply cuts based on ID truth / TTree lookup.
Figure 1 -- Shows corrspondence between the number of hits in the TPC (0-49), SST( 50-54), IST (55-59) and PXL (60-65).
z-axis is cut... < 100 entries are eliminated. Note that the z-axis is scaled by 1000. Looks like a good (enough) correlation to proceed.
NOTE -- in debugging these plots, I found that the base QA code has an issue with respect to clone tracks. TPC only tracks are not considered when counting clones -- i.e. a track may be split into two. One is HFT, one is TPC only, and the base QA doesn't register this as a clone. The reason for this is that TPC only tracks are eliminated from study before the clone classification is made. Will need to revisit this.
Method: Reconstruct events with HFT in tracking. Create a TTree associating ID truth with number of reco hits in each layer. Process TPC only tracking sample and apply cuts based on ID truth / TTree lookup.
Figure 1 -- Shows corrspondence between the number of hits in the TPC (0-49), SST( 50-54), IST (55-59) and PXL (60-65).
z-axis is cut... < 100 entries are eliminated. Note that the z-axis is scaled by 1000. Looks like a good (enough) correlation to proceed.
NOTE -- in debugging these plots, I found that the base QA code has an issue with respect to clone tracks. TPC only tracks are not considered when counting clones -- i.e. a track may be split into two. One is HFT, one is TPC only, and the base QA doesn't register this as a clone. The reason for this is that TPC only tracks are eliminated from study before the clone classification is made. Will need to revisit this.
»
- jwebb's blog
- Login or register to post comments