Sanity check of the new IST and SSD geometries
Updated on Fri, 2014-11-14 14:59. Originally created by jwebb on 2014-11-13 10:40.
Figure 1 -- LEFT: Number of GEANT steps taken vs radius, for y2014a in SL14g. RIGHT: Number of GEANT steps taken vs radius for y2014a in DEV (11/13/14).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/402a7/402a78c0abe193edd90ae7ec449e8f3288a6a222" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa60/4fa6089f3a232f6f75db5292eee62494f95f7faf" alt=""
Figure 2 -- Accumulated energy loss vs radius. Comparison between DEV (11/13) and PRO (SL14g).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a7a7/2a7a73c5087eaf6069233921de8e3396f823cf4c" alt=""
Figure 3 -- SFLM Material Distribution
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d87e/7d87ec2ce544fb3ec8b9b8fd0ea31539e5737e66" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ef7f/0ef7ff34991e3ccdac9e11125fe6e8a6f00b2f10" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22544/22544b988b2bd08f9044d4caa2b9aee971aa5499" alt=""
Figure 4 -- Obtain density distribution by sampling random points. Density (arbitray units) vs Z, R and Phi. Units are arbitrary because I need to divide by the total number of points sampled.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1a1d/c1a1d97de53196601db2b340735fce7e824cc5da" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2dfc7/2dfc7b59ca4314983daac1b3afd0261e0df76771" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f546/6f54637b0747a21c4d645c7fba61738031684e6b" alt=""
Zooming in on the density vs z, I see three regions of interest:
1) -34.0 to +34.0 cm
2) -50.5 to -34.0 cm
3) +34.0 to +50.5 cm
These are approximate, but looks like it gets most of the dense material
Figure 2 -- Accumulated energy loss vs radius. Comparison between DEV (11/13) and PRO (SL14g).
Figure 3 -- SFLM Material Distribution
Figure 4 -- Obtain density distribution by sampling random points. Density (arbitray units) vs Z, R and Phi. Units are arbitrary because I need to divide by the total number of points sampled.
Zooming in on the density vs z, I see three regions of interest:
1) -34.0 to +34.0 cm
2) -50.5 to -34.0 cm
3) +34.0 to +50.5 cm
These are approximate, but looks like it gets most of the dense material
»
- jwebb's blog
- Login or register to post comments