- leun's home page
- Posts
- 2013
- 2012
- December (2)
- October (3)
- September (2)
- August (1)
- July (4)
- June (4)
- May (2)
- April (3)
- March (5)
- February (5)
- January (5)
- 2011
- December (3)
- November (3)
- September (5)
- August (2)
- July (2)
- June (3)
- May (4)
- April (4)
- March (2)
- February (4)
- January (2)
- 2010
- December (2)
- November (3)
- October (3)
- September (5)
- August (6)
- July (2)
- June (4)
- May (3)
- April (4)
- March (4)
- February (2)
- January (4)
- 2009
- 2008
- October (1)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
FGT timing scan 02/07/2012
Timing scan for 2012/02/07
Int_t day[15] ={37, 37, 37, 37, 38, 38, 38, 37, 37, 38, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37};
Int_t run[15] ={25, 26, 28, 29, 85, 86, 87, 33, 34, 84, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40};
Int_t latency[15]={30, 33, 39, 42, 45, 46, 47, 48, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 66, 69};
Fig. 1. t0 distribution vs latency, normalized by the total numebr of events analyzed by my code
Fig. 2. t0 distribution vs latency, number of pulses seen
Now only looking at the R strips between 20~120 and 420~520.
Fig. 3. t0 distribution vs latency, normalized by the total numebr of events analyzed by my code, with R-strip requirement
Fig. 4. t0 distribution vs latency, number of pulses seen
Fig. 5. Number of events anlayzed vs latency
Groups:
- leun's blog
- Login or register to post comments