This is a spreadsheet pertain to Run15 pp200_trans data, listing all the Channels for the FPS, their average MIP peak positions, their average Sigma values, and some additional calculations.

The Channels are listed in sequential order, and, as you can see in the first column of the sheet, the corresponding Quadrant and Layer of that Channel is listed. (Quadrant 1 is in Yellow, Quadrant 2 is in Orange, Quadrant 3 is in Purple, Quadrant 4 is in Grey && Layer 1 is in Blue, Layer 2 is in Green, Layer 3 is in Red).

The MIP peak position in averaged over all runs, and then 1.0 (the calibrated position for the FPS) is subtracted from it to see how far away from the desired value the current MIP peak is. The peaks that are >10% away are in yellow, and the peaks that are >20% away are in red.

The sigma values are calculated from a combination of Layers 1 and 2 together, and then Layer 3 independently, as there are nontrivial difference after particles pass through the tungsten alloy. Sigma values that are between 1-2 sigma from the mean are denoted in yellow. Sigma values that are >2 sigma from the mean are denoted in read.

As some of the Channels have a stark discrepancy in their MIP values occurring with a noteable stabilization after Run 16078042 (Thursday, March 19th, 2015), I have also independently calculated the average in the MIP position for the first 235 runs (the dates before March 19th) and the latter 454 Runs (the dates after March 19th). I have then compared the two values and noted anytime the latter has a 10% deviation from the former in yellow truth values, and anytime the latter has a 20% deviation from the former in red truth values.

Finally, I have once again calculated the average MIP peak position from the latter 454 runs, as I feel it is a more accurate representation of the current calibration in case any changes wish to be made.

The large grey box to the far right can be ignored. I have simply used this area for calculations.

Best,
Luke