Here I present the results of the MuDst based QA of the 2009 RFF reproduction sample ...

I have processed 40 runs from the original RFF production (P10ic) and the same 40 runs from the new RFF production (P11id). I have also included the new FF production used in the previous comparison.

Figure 1: This figure shows the track phi vs eta distributions. The upper left pannel shows the original RFF production, the upper right pannel shows the new RFF production and the bottom left pannel shows the new FF production for comparison.

Figure 2: This figure shows the track phi vs charge signed pt. The upper left pannel shows the original RFF production, the upper right pannel shows the new RFF production and the bottom left pannel shows the new FF production for comparison.

Figure 3: This figure shows the h-/h+ spectra for tracks in the East (upper left pannel) and West (upper right pannel) TPC along with the h-/h+ ratios (lower left pannel). The Blue spectra are negative charge sign tracks, the Red are positive tracks, the Black points are for the East TPC tracks, and the Green points are for the West TPC tracks. This is for the Old RFF sample.

Figure 4: This is the same as figue 3 but now for the new RFF sample.

Figure 5: This is the same as figure 3 but now for the new FF sample.

I have also created a number of pdfs which look at like sign and unlike sign track comparisons as a function of sector for the original RFF production and the new RFF and FF productions:

This pdf compares like sign track distributions from the original and new RFF samples

This pdf compares like sign track distributions from the new RFF and FF samples

This pdf compares like sign track distributions from the old RFF and new FF samples

This pdf compares unlike sign track distributions (h+/h-) from the original and new RFF samples

This pdf compares unlike sign track distributions (h+/h-) from the new RFF and FF samples

This pdf compares unlike sign track distributions (h+/h-) from the old RFF and new FF samples