I don't have closure on the source of the bht3 background yet.

In the meantime, I do see that there is no module that is recording conspicuously high numbers of hits.  Unfortunately, this plot doesn't have an evergy threshold in it.  An improved plot showing the trigger rate by trigger patch will hopefully be more helpful (but not quite ready today).

I've also run the first section of my code on the other vernier scan run, which can be seen below (10103044).  (10102067 and 068 are both short per a special request by Bill Christie.  They can't be used for absolute cross section purposes.).  I've asked Angelika for the timing for the appropriate fill, and when I have that information I can perform a consistency check to make sure both the scans have similar background rates, which may help track things down if I can't identify a set of misbehaving trigger patches.