- rcorliss's home page
- Posts
- 2013
- January (1)
- 2012
- 2011
- 2010
- December (1)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (2)
- June (2)
- May (3)
- April (3)
- March (5)
- February (2)
- January (8)
- 2009
- December (5)
- November (1)
- October (7)
- September (10)
- August (4)
- July (3)
- May (1)
- February (1)
- January (1)
- 2008
- 2007
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
BHT3coin vs dijets
I've made some progress toward validating the BHT3coincidence requirement's stability vs the dijet rate. I took the largest mudst from each run included in the W run list, and counted the number of events that passed the dijet trigger (the L2jet algorithm with the requirement that the dijet bit be set in the L2Result) as well as the number of BHT3coin triggers (the L0 BHT3 trigger with the requirement of away-side energy with an opening of 10 bins (=1/3 of the phi range), as was first defined).
There is no BHT3 prescale
The number of dijets is multiplied by the JP1 prescale (50 across all runs of interest, apparently -- I thought it was changing dynamically?)
At the moment I have only verified the prescale for the standard JP1 - trigger ID 230410. There are a few other trigger IDs that could be added in. it's possible that one of these is responsible for the low patch in the plot below.
Specifically, the runs that fall below a ratio of 0.065 are:
Low: R10087059, ratio=0.063958
Low: R10087110, ratio=0.055000
Low: R10088122, ratio=0.064500
Low: R10089080, ratio=0.061351
Low: R10095120, ratio=0.042972
Low: R10095121, ratio=0.050401
Low: R10096001, ratio=0.050464
Low: R10096002, ratio=0.047394
Low: R10096005, ratio=0.055789
Low: R10096006, ratio=0.051583
Low: R10096007, ratio=0.046429
Low: R10096008, ratio=0.052723
Low: R10096009, ratio=0.053578
Low: R10096014, ratio=0.055065
Low: R10096015, ratio=0.051432
Low: R10096019, ratio=0.055869
Low: R10096025, ratio=0.050281
Low: R10096026, ratio=0.052851
Low: R10096027, ratio=0.054968
Low: R10096139, ratio=0.033178
Low: R10096140, ratio=0.040067
Low: R10097038, ratio=0.038329
Low: R10097044, ratio=0.037293
Low: R10097086, ratio=0.023682
Low: R10097088, ratio=0.044306
Low: R10097090, ratio=0.057333
- rcorliss's blog
- Login or register to post comments