- rcorliss's home page
- Posts
- 2013
- January (1)
- 2012
- 2011
- 2010
- December (1)
- October (2)
- September (2)
- August (2)
- June (2)
- May (3)
- April (3)
- March (5)
- February (2)
- January (8)
- 2009
- December (5)
- November (1)
- October (7)
- September (10)
- August (4)
- July (3)
- May (1)
- February (1)
- January (1)
- 2008
- 2007
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
almost done.
I've finally gotten the kinks worked out of the code, and can demonstrate once again that the cross section is essentially independent of the choice of away-side opening angle. There is a slight upward drift as the angle widens, which should be expected, since the less 'away' the away side energy is, the more likely it's associated with background. The associated background rates and uncertainties will follow shortly, and then the updated starnote.
I will attach the luminosity by run once I've resolved the dead fills, and will issue a final version (v5) when I upload the starnote.
Total integrated luminosity as determined by different BHT3coin conditions:
Angle=0,sumL=12.958104pb^-1
Angle=1,sumL=10.542626pb^-1
Angle=2,sumL=11.718079pb^-1
Angle=3,sumL=12.294696pb^-1
Angle=4,sumL=12.619625pb^-1
Angle=5,sumL=12.683365pb^-1
Angle=6,sumL=12.812954pb^-1
Angle=7,sumL=12.855909pb^-1
Angle=8,sumL=12.853354pb^-1
Angle=9,sumL=12.872662pb^-1
Angle=10,sumL=12.849817pb^-1
Angle=11,sumL=12.897146pb^-1
Angle=12,sumL=12.926191pb^-1
Angle=13,sumL=12.965418pb^-1
Angle=14,sumL=12.961200pb^-1
- rcorliss's blog
- Login or register to post comments