List of paper figures (Inclusive jets in AuAu 200 GeV)
.png)
Fig. 1 - Distribution of pTreco and jet area for the inclusive charged-jet population (pTleadmin=0) in central Au+Au collisions.
Upper panels: pTreco vs jet area for R=0.2 (left) and R=0.4 (right). Middle and lower panels: projection onto the jet area axis.
Also shown are area distributions for PYTHIA-generated (middle) and SP jets (lower) with pTembed=10 and 20 GeV/c, embedded
into real \AuAu\ data for central collisions. The vertical dashed lines show the jet area cut. See text for details.
.png)
Fig. 2 - Distribution of inclusive jet candidates passing the jet area cut as a function of pTreco for R=0.2, 0.3 and 0.4, in peripheral
(left) and central (right) Au+Au collisions.
.png)
Fig. 3 - Distribution of pTreco measured in Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV, for pTleadmin=0, 3, 5 and 7 GeV/c. Left:
peripheral; right: central. Upper:R=0.2; middle: R=0.3; lower: R=0.4. The distributions for pTleadmin=0 are the same as those in Fig. 2.
.png)
Fig. 4 - Instrumental jet response: distribution of pTdet for u-quark jets generated by PYTHIA with various values of pTpart,
with detector effects corresponding to those in central Au+Au collisions. Jets have R=0.3 and are selected with the requirement
pTleadmin=5 GeV/c, at both the particle and detector level. The red distributions show a Gaussian functional fit to the peak region
of each distribution, with relative width of the fit as shown.
.png)
Fig. 5 - Jet reconstruction efficiency in peripheral (left) and central (right) Au+Au collisions, for R=0.3 and pTleadmin=5 GeV/c,
for u-quarks and gluons in the ratio 2:1 (labelled ``nominal", pure u, pure g, and variation of the relative tracking efficiency by
+/-5% for the nominal population.
.png)
Fig. 6 - Response matrix for charged jets with pTleadmin=5 GeV/c and R=0.3. Left: background fluctuations matrix Rbkg;
center: detector effects matrix Rdet; right: Rfull = Rbkg x Rdet.
.png)
Fig. 7 - delta-pT distributions calculated by embedding various types of simulated jet in central Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV,
for R=0.2 (left) and R=0.4 (right). Upper panels: pTembed=20 GeV/c for SP jets, SP jets with v2-modulated background, and light quark
jets generated by PYTHIA. Lower panels: SP jets for several values of pTembed. See text for details.
.png)
Fig. 8 - Estimated magnitude of corrections for charged jets with R=0.3 and pTleadmin=5.0 GeV/c, for central Au+Au collisions. See text for details.
.png)
Fig. 9 - Distribution of pTcorr for PM-generated events for various values of pTleadmin, compared to central Au+Au collisions
data shown in Fig. 3. The PM parameters are given in Tab. II. Left: R=0.2; right R=0.4. The lower panels show the ratio of the
PM and data distributions for pTleadmin=0 and pTleadmin=5 GeV/c.
.png)
Fig. 10 - Closure test for PM-generated events corresponding to central Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV.
.png)
Fig. 11 - The inclusive cross section of pions in p+p collisions at sqrt(s) = 200 GeV from measurements and from a PYTHIA
simulation (see text for details). The lower panel shows the ratios of data and PYTHIA distributions.
.png)
Fig. 12 - Corrected quasi-inclusive charged jets in Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV, for R=0.2, 0.3, and 0.4. Left: peripheral;
right: central Au+Au collisions. Upper: pTleadmin=5.0 GeV/c; lower: pTleadmin=7.0 GeV/c. Correlated and shape systematic uncertainties
are shown separately. The value of pTjetch is shifted for each data point to account for the spectrum shape.
.png)
Fig. 13 - Ratio of quasi-inclusive charged-jet cross sections for R = 0.2 (red) and 0.4 (blue) in pp collisions at sqrt(s)= 200 GeV simulated by PYTHIA,
for p_T,lead^min = 5 GeV/c relative to the unbiased distribution (“5/0”, dashed) and p_T,lead^min = 7 GeV/c relative to p_T,lead^min = 5 GeV/c (“7/5”, solid).
.png)
Fig. 14 - Ratio of distributions from Fig. 12 for pTleadmin=7.0 GeV/c and 5.0 GeV/c, for R=0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 in
peripheral (top) and central (bottom) Au+Au collisions. The systematic uncertainty of the ratio accounts for the correlated
systematic uncertainty of numerator and denominator.
.png)
Fig. 15 - RCP ((0-10\%)/(60-80\%)) for Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV, for R=0.2, 0.3 and 0.4. See text for details.
.png)
Fig. 16 - RCP distributions from Fig. 14 compared to that measured in Pb+Pb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=2.76 TeV, for R=0.2
(left) and R=0.3 (right). Also shown are RCP\ for inclusive charged hadrons in Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV and
in Pb+Pb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=2.76 TeV. The charged hadrons RCP distributions are the same in the two panels.
The different choices of centrality class are discussed in the text.
.png)
Fig. 17 - RAA^pyth for quasi-inclusive charged jets in peripheral (top) and central (bottom) Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV,
for R=0.2, 0.3 and 0.4. The reference spectrum for p+p collisions at sqrt(s)=200 GeV is generated by PYTHIA; see text for details.
The region where the bias due to the pTleadmin cut is small is indicated by the vertical dashed line.
.png)
Fig. 18- Comparison of RAA^pyth from Fig. 17 (stars) to charged hadron and pi0 RAA at sqrt(s_NN)= 200 GeV. he vertical dashed line. The simulated distributions do not
have a cut on pTleadmin. Only points from the region where the bias in the data due to the p_T,lead^min cut is small are shown.
Fig. 19- Comparison of RAA^pyth from Fig. 17 (stars) to theoretical calculations for full jets labeled as NLO (solid line), SCET (dashed line), and Hybrid Model (histogram).
See text for details of the calculations. Only points from the region where the bias in the data due to the p_T,lead^min cut is small are shown. The simulated distributions do not
have a cut on pTleadmin.
Fig. 20 - Ratio of quasi-inclusive yields for charged jets with R=0.2 and R=0.4, for peripheral (left) and central (right) Au+Au
collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV and pTleadmin=5 GeV/c. Calculations of this ratio are shown for charged jets in p+p collisions
at sqrt(s)=200 GeV simulated by PYTHIA and HERWIG; both panels show the same distributions from these calculations.
Also are predictions for fully-reconstructed jets in Au+Au collisions from the theoretical calculations described in Sect. X.
The simulated distributions do not have a cut on pTleadmin.
- rusnak's blog
- Login or register to post comments