Estimate luminosity for Upsilons in p+Au
Goal: 10% statistic error
- “Statistics” is not pure stats ( sqrt(N) ) but error from fits with correlated parameters
- “experimental” observation: still error = A*sqrt(N), 1.5<A<2 for any good significant Y peak no matter of species and algorithm
(see table at the end)
Solving 0.1 N=A*sqrt(N) for A=1.5 .. A=2 gives N=250…400
Scaling from d+Au
R(pA)/R(dA)=X(dA)/X(pA) * Ncoll(dA)/Ncoll(pA) * sigY(pA)/sigY(dA)
• Assumption: R(dAu) ~ R(pAu)
• Ncoll(dAu)/Ncoll(pAu) ~ 1.5
(1.5 used previously by STAR. I tried the Phobos Glauber run gives 1.6 (with default parameters, 200 GeV)
• Glauber inelastic x-sections: X(dA) = 2.11, X(pA) = 1.74
==> sigY(dA)/sigY(pA)=1.8
• Assuming similar efficiencies, with intLum(dA) = 28.2 nb^-1 ,
intLum(pA) = intLum(dA) * N(pA)/N(dA) * sigY(dA)/sigY(pA)
estimate
- For the |y|<0.5 bin (66 dAu hits): 200 … 300 nb^-1
- For the |y|<1 bin: (115 dAu hits): 100 … 175 nb^-1
- For the -1<y<0.5 bin: (21 dAu hits): 600 … 950 nb^-1
appendix
Species/fit examples |
yield |
error |
A |
pp |y|<0.5 |
196 |
25 |
1.8 |
dAu |y|<0.5 |
66 |
14 |
1.7 |
pp 0.5<|y|<1 |
96 |
15 |
1.5 |
dAu 0.5<|y|<1 |
21 |
7 |
1.5 |
AuAu 0-10% |y|<1 |
66 |
17 |
2.0 |
AuAu1S 10-30% |y|<1 |
120 |
20 |
1.8 |
AuAu 30-60% |y|<0.5 |
43 |
10 |
1.5 |
UU 0-60% |y|<1 |
73 |
14 |
1.6 |
- rvertesi's blog
- Login or register to post comments