Run9 Dijet Response Matrix Test

First Scheme:
All = Bin1 + Bin2 + Bin3 + Bin4

Bin 1 = Barrel-Barrel and dijets not containing JP1Lo
Bin 2 = Barrel-Barrel and dijets containing JP1Lo
Bin 3 = Endcap included and dijets not containing JP1Lo
Bin 4 = Endcap included and dijets containing JP1Lo

Figure 1: This figure shows the away vs same side jet pt for the different bins
Figure 2: This figure shows the away vs same side jet physical eta
Figure 3: This figure shows the away vs same side jet detector eta
Figure 4: This figure shows the binned particle vs detector level dijet mass. The figure in 6th pad shows the bin averages overlayed
Figure 5: This figure shows the particle vs detector level dijet mass. The figure in 6th pad shows the bin averages overlayed

Add High Pt Cut used by Brian:

• JP2        > 45 GeV
• JP1Hi     > 40 GeV
• UnJP2    > 45 GeV
• UnJP1Lo > 30 GeV
• UnJP1Hi > 30 GeV
Figure 6: This figure shows the away vs same side jet pt for the different bins
Figure 7: This figure shows the away vs same side jet physical eta
Figure 8: This figure shows the away vs same side jet detector eta
Figure 9: This figure shows the binned particle vs detector level dijet mass. The figure in 6th pad shows the bin averages overlayed
Figure 10: This figure shows the binned particle vs detector level dijet mass. The figure in 6th pad shows the bin averages overlayed

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second Scheme:
All = Bin1 + Bin2 + Bin3 + Bin4

Bin1 = |jet rapidity| < 1 && L2JetHigh triggers
Bin2 = |jet rapidity| < 1 && JP1 triggers
Bin3 = |jet rapidity| >= 1 && L2JetHigh triggers
Bin4 = |jet rapidity| >= 1 && JP1 triggers

Figure 1: This figure shows the away vs same side jet pt for the different bins
Figure 2: This figure shows the away vs same side jet physical eta
This figure shows the away vs same side jet detector eta
Figure 4: This figure shows the binned particle vs detector level dijet mass. The figure in 6th pad shows the bin averages overlayed
Figure 5: This figure shows the particle vs detector level dijet mass. The figure in 6th pad shows the bin averages overlayed
Add High Pt Cut used by Brian:

• JP2        > 45 GeV
• JP1Hi     > 40 GeV
• UnJP2    > 45 GeV
• UnJP1Lo > 30 GeV
• UnJP1Hi > 30 GeV

Figure 6: This figure shows the away vs same side jet pt for the different bins
Figure 7: This figure shows the away vs same side jet physical eta
Figure 8: This figure shows the away vs same side jet detector eta
Figure 9: This figure shows the binned particle vs detector level dijet mass. The figure in 6th pad shows the bin averages overlayed
Figure 10: This figure shows the binned particle vs detector level dijet mass. The figure in 6th pad shows the bin averages overlayed

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Scheme:
All = Bin1 + Bin2 + Bin3 + Bin4

Bin 1 = Barrel-Barrel L2JetHigh
Bin 2 = Barrel-Barrel JP
Bin 3 = Endcap included L2JetHigh
Bin 4 = Endcap included JP
Figure 1:
Figure 2: Add high Pt cuts
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plots for different topologies:
Figure 1:
Figure 2: Add high Pt cuts
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jet Particle Vs. Detector Comparison For Different Triggers
Figure 1: Jet Particle Pt Vs. Detector Eta
Figure 2: Jet Detector Pt Vs. Detector Eta
Figure 3: Jet Detector - Particle Pt difference Vs. Detector Eta
Figure 4: Jet Detector/Particle Pt ratio Vs. Detector Eta
Figure 5: Jet Particle Rt Vs. Detector Eta
Figure 6: Jet Detector Rt Vs. Detector Eta
Figure 7: Jet Detector - Particle Rt difference Vs. Detector Eta
Figure 8: Jet Detector/Particle Rt ratio Vs. Detector Eta
Figure 9: Number of tracks Vs. Detector Eta