- xuanli's home page
- Posts
- 2015
- 2014
- 2013
- December (4)
- November (2)
- October (6)
- September (4)
- August (6)
- July (4)
- June (4)
- May (4)
- April (3)
- March (15)
- February (6)
- January (5)
- 2012
- December (3)
- November (10)
- October (9)
- September (4)
- August (5)
- July (11)
- June (3)
- May (1)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- January (2)
- 2011
- December (3)
- October (4)
- September (3)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (6)
- May (13)
- April (7)
- March (10)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2010
- 2009
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
ESMD pedestal cross check update
Qinghua and I found a debug in the StADCMaker.cxx. I should use the class "strip" not "hitstrip" to get the raw ADC distribution. After the modifications, for the following 4 runs,
run index run number
1 9059045
2 9060056
3 9061067
4 9061096
And in my plots, the strip is marked from 0 to 287 and the sector is marked from 0 to 11. The data points are using the mean of the raw ADC distribution, and the error bars are using the RMS of the raw ADC distribution.
Fig1, U pannel sector 2 strip1.
Fig2, U pannel sector 2 strip11.
Groups:
- xuanli's blog
- Login or register to post comments