- xuanli's home page
- Posts
- 2015
- 2014
- 2013
- December (4)
- November (2)
- October (6)
- September (4)
- August (6)
- July (4)
- June (4)
- May (4)
- April (3)
- March (15)
- February (6)
- January (5)
- 2012
- December (3)
- November (10)
- October (9)
- September (4)
- August (5)
- July (11)
- June (3)
- May (1)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- January (2)
- 2011
- December (3)
- October (4)
- September (3)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (6)
- May (13)
- April (7)
- March (10)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2010
- 2009
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
p+p simulation comparison
Comparation between FMS triggered data and simulation in p+p
(1) FMS Selections
1, in data, using FMS triggered data, selec at least one reconstructed pi0 in the FMS with pt > 2.0GeV/c.
2, in simulation, applying FMS acceptance cuts for pi0 decayed photons, and requiring the pi0 with pt > 2.0GeV/c.
(2) BBC requirement
East BBC charge sum non-zero and west BBC charge sum non-zero.
(3) Results
Using STAR library SL11b, and the tower threshold 250MeV. The following plots show the ratios of values in new simulation over the same parameters in the old simulation.
1, EEMC
Figure1, EEMC tower multiplicity shown in the left and tower energy (normalized by events) shown in the right above 250MeV.
Figure2, EEMC zvertex distribution (left) and the single cluster energy (right).
2, BEMC
Figure3, BEMC tower multiplicity shown in the left and tower energy (normalized by events) shown in the right above 250MeV.
Figure4, BEMC zvertex distribution (left) and the single cluster energy (right).
Conclusion:
The energy scales in old and new simulations are generally consistent.
- xuanli's blog
- Login or register to post comments