- yezhenyu's home page
- Posts
- 2022
- April (1)
- 2021
- August (1)
- 2020
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- November (2)
- September (2)
- August (4)
- July (2)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (3)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (10)
- 2016
- December (3)
- November (2)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (3)
- July (1)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (3)
- January (2)
- 2015
- December (2)
- November (6)
- October (1)
- September (5)
- August (3)
- July (6)
- June (1)
- May (7)
- April (3)
- March (1)
- February (7)
- 2014
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
HF PWG Meeting Minutes by Zhenyu - 2017/2/16
Updated on Thu, 2017-02-16 12:25. Originally created by yezhenyu on 2017-02-16 12:25.
1) D0-h in Run11 p+p - Long Ma
slide 2: 5-8 GeV/c, disagreement between data and Pythia, near-side large fluctuation in data
slide 3: Long gets trigger efficiency obtained from ratio between MB and HT1 Pion spectra. difference to David's study: David convoluted pi efficiency in MC toy to estimate D* efficiency, while Long factorize single pion trigger efficiency and D* efficiency. By doing so, Long assumes the two are uncorrelated. Long will add a systematic uncertainty for such bias
slide 4: make the same comparison but for triggered hadrons to see the abovementioned effect (systematic uncertainty) on h-h
slide 12: h-h in data are for pi-h with pi triggered by HT and identified by dEdx. What is purity of pion in data? How large difference among pi-h and k-h and p-h in Pythia?
slide 12: h-h in data are for pi-h with pi triggered by HT and identified by dEdx. What is purity of pion in data? How large difference among pi-h and k-h and p-h in Pythia?
slide 13: add pythia h-h bands
2) Lc in Run16 Au+Au - Sooraj
slide 2: 650M->2B
slide 10: TPC tracks only
slide 12: prepare Run16 embedding request, conveners will follow up with the PAC on the test Run14 data production with StiCA
»
- yezhenyu's blog
- Login or register to post comments