[1]1281.26

[2]1010.97

[3]798.527

[4]628.011

[5]490.596

[6]379.861

[7]290.308

[8]217.353

[9]160.027

[10]115.689

[11]81.7581

[12]56.9773

[13]38.3629

[14]25.0591

[15]16.2799

[16]10.2311

 

[1]414.873

[2]355.421

[3]300.918

[4]253.662

[5]212.842

[6]177.481

[7]146.781

[8]119.633

[9]96.3434

[10]76.4301

[11]59.5496

[12]45.7347

[13]34.0142

[14]24.5462

[15]17.4621

[16]11.9753

 

These were obtained by tuning the Glauber modelto STAR data
taken in 2012. There is a paper from Hiroshi in 2009 which
was based on Glauber model default parameters.

 

 

What I ended up using is to take the central values from

the numbers which were tuned to STAR data, and took the

uncertainty from the paper.