- yezhenyu's home page
- Posts
- 2022
- April (1)
- 2021
- August (1)
- 2020
- 2019
- 2018
- 2017
- November (2)
- September (2)
- August (4)
- July (2)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (3)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (10)
- 2016
- December (3)
- November (2)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (3)
- July (1)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (3)
- January (2)
- 2015
- December (2)
- November (6)
- October (1)
- September (5)
- August (3)
- July (6)
- June (1)
- May (7)
- April (3)
- March (1)
- February (7)
- 2014
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
NPE in Run14 Au+Au 200 GeV Meeting Minutes by Xin - 2015/07/17
1) Data - Kunsu
Slide 2, BSMD efficiency ~60%, seems a bit low, Wei/Xiaozhi commented in pp the total BEMC+BSMD is about 60%.
There was some concern about the Run14 calibration issue? Run14 is using Run12 DB, no other firm statements
Kunsu will check the BEMC/BSMD matching and profile distributions (posted later)
Slide 3, events with large pre-scale gives large fluctuations
Wei suggested: for nSigmaE, one doesn’t care about the weighting. For final spectra use the averaged prescale factor instead of applying this track-by-track
Kunsu will also need to check these runs why they have these large numbers.
Slide 7, tail in the red histograms – Kunsu will check the fraction. We need to understand the origin.
Conversion electron statistics – try to use TPC cuts for the partner
2) Simulation - Xiaozhi
From simulation try to separate real matches and mis-mtaches to better understand the tail. Quantify the tail comparison by plotting the fraction of the grass for pions and electrons
To-do: Implement EvGen, Study the DCA discussion for conversion electrons in simulation for total single and reconstructed ones.
- yezhenyu's blog
- Login or register to post comments