- yezhenyu's home page
- Posts
- 2022
- April (1)
- 2021
- 2020
- 2019
- December (1)
- November (2)
- October (1)
- September (3)
- August (1)
- July (2)
- June (3)
- April (2)
- March (1)
- January (1)
- 2018
- 2017
- November (2)
- September (2)
- August (4)
- July (2)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (3)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- January (10)
- 2016
- December (3)
- November (2)
- October (2)
- September (3)
- August (3)
- July (1)
- June (1)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (3)
- January (2)
- 2015
- December (2)
- November (6)
- October (1)
- September (5)
- August (3)
- July (6)
- June (1)
- May (7)
- April (3)
- March (1)
- February (7)
- 2014
- 2013
- May (1)
- My blog
- Post new blog entry
- All blogs
xxx
Updated on Wed, 2017-01-25 00:26. Originally created by yezhenyu on 2017-01-25 00:26.
1) Kunsu
slide 2: comparison between Kunsu and Xiaozhi -> have identified and fixed the TOF, DCA issues in Xiaozhi's anaTree
slide 7: stepSize should not affect the cut pairDCA<0.6 cm and pairMass<0.06 GeV
slide 9: inclusive from MB, PHE from MB+HT (MB) Kunsu (Xiaozhi), there is a shape difference around 0 for inclusive electron, and normalization difference
slide 10-11: significant difference between Xiaozhi/Kunsu for simulation, will look into it
slide 14: 20-70% hadron from the fit, change AuAu pT binning to pp pT binning
»
- yezhenyu's blog
- Login or register to post comments