- BEMC
- EEMC
- ETOF
- FCS
- FGT
- FGT. . . . . . . . . . I N S T R U C T I O N S
- FGT. . . . . . . . . . P H Y S I C S
- FGT. . . . . . . . . . S I M U L A T I O N S
- FGT. . . . . . . . . H A R D W A R E -- D E T E C T O R
- FGT . . . . . . . . . . A N A L Y S I S
- Estimation of error of A_L including detector response, May 2008 (Jan)
- study 1 of S/B, A_L, LT=800/pb (Jan)
- study 2 , err(AL) , eta=[1,2], LT=800/pb (Jan)
- study 3 , cross check w/ FGT proposal, LT=800/pb (Jan)
- study 4 , LT=300/pb, eta=+/-[1,2] , W+/- (Jan)
- study 5 charge sign discrimination
- study 6 final plots for PAC, May 2008
- study 7 revised for White Paper, AL(eta), AL(ET) , (Jan)
- study 8 no QCD backg AL(eta), AL(ET), also rapidity (Jan)
- study 9 sensitivity of STAR at forward & mid rapidity
- study 9a sensitivity mid rapidity LT=10/pb
- study 9b sensitivity at mid rapidity LT=10/pb Pol=50% or 60%
- e/h algo for Barrel
- e/h discrimination in the Endcap
- Estimation of error of A_L including detector response, May 2008 (Jan)
- FGT . . . . . . . . . . C A L I B R A T I O N
- FGT . . . . . . . . . . D O C U M E N T S
- FGT . . . . . . . . . . DAQ
- FGT . . . . . . . . . . M E E T I N G S
- FGT. . . . . . . . . . H A R D W A R E -- E L E C T R O N I C S
- FGT. . . . . . . . . . H A R D W A R E -- S L O W C O N T R O L S
- FGT. . . . . . . . . . P H O T O - - G A L L E R Y
- FGT. . . . . . . . . . S O F T W A R E
- FGT. . . . . . . . . . V A R I A
- FGT. . . . . . . . . . x -T R A S H (node for recycling)
- FPD & FMS & FPS
- FTPC
- FTT
- HLT
- L3
- PMD
- PP2PP
- RICH
- Roman Pot Phase II*
- SSD
- SVT
- Slow Controls
- TPC
- TRG
- Trigger Detectors
- VPD
- test
study 5 charge sign discrimination
Updated on Tue, 2008-05-13 11:47. Originally created by balewski on 2008-05-03 22:38.
Under:
Fig 1 charge reco misidentification (details), M-C simulations
FGT 6 identical disk have active area Rin=11.5 cm, Rout=37.6 cm;
Z location: 70,80,90, 100,110,120 cm with respect to STAR ref frame.
Fig 2
Unpolarized yield for W+, RHICBOS
Fig 3
Unpolarized yield for W-, RHICBOS
Fig 4
Unpolarized & pol yield for W+, RHICBOS, ideal detector
Fig 5
Unpolarized & pol yield for W-, RHICBOS, ideal detector
»
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments